My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-17 CBD Height text amendment
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Legislation
>
Upcoming Bills
>
2017
>
02-27-2017
>
08-17 CBD Height text amendment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2017 8:37:21 AM
Creation date
2/22/2017 3:52:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Ordinances
City Counci - Date
2/27/2017
Ord-Res Number
08-17
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Staff Report <br />2/9/2017 <br />low- density concept was being championed by the 10 stakeholder groups that participated <br />in the planning process. The plan emphasized the use of low to mid -rise buildings. This <br />was a reaffirmation of the 60' height limit for the CBD District east of the St. Joseph <br />River. <br />Height Adjustments — Two variances were approved by the ABZA, one in 2013 for the <br />Cascade project to 76' and one in 2015 for East Bank Flats (Sycamore and Colfax) for 70' <br />The mechanical portions of the buildings were permitted to extend up to 90' and 78' <br />respectively, but only to the extent necessary and shown on the plans. Both of these <br />projects are located on the Island. These projects were granted approvals to exceed the 60' <br />maximum height limit, but well below the proposed 150' maximum height limit. The <br />threshold for mid -rise buildings is generally considered to be 75'. <br />Recommendation: <br />Based on information available prior to the public hearing, the staff recommends that the <br />petition be sent to the Common Council with an unfavorable recommendation. <br />Analysis: <br />The proposed maximum height limit change for the CBD District east of the St. Joseph <br />River is contrary to the place- building concepts adopted by the Zoning Ordinance, the <br />East Bank Plan and the height adjustments approved by the Area Board of Zoning <br />Appeals. The appropriate and responsible path in seeking such a dramatic change to the <br />height requirements is to undertake a well - established public process to amend the East <br />Bank Plan, and to let that suggest the best course of action. <br />APC 4 2812 -17 Page 2 of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.