My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-17 CBD Height text amendment
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Legislation
>
Upcoming Bills
>
2017
>
02-27-2017
>
08-17 CBD Height text amendment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2017 8:37:21 AM
Creation date
2/22/2017 3:52:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Ordinances
City Counci - Date
2/27/2017
Ord-Res Number
08-17
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Staff Report <br />APC # <br />2812 -17 <br />Owner: <br />Common Council of the City of South Bend <br />Location: <br />Text Amendment <br />Jurisdiction: <br />City of South Bend <br />Public Hearing Date: <br />2/21/2017 <br />Requested Action: <br />2/9/2017 <br />Filed in Clerk's Office <br />FEB 2 2 2017 <br />KAREEMAH FOWLER <br />CITY CLERK, SOUTH BEND, IN <br />The petitioner is requesting a text amendment, amending Chapter 21, Article 3 of <br />the South Bend Municipal Code to increase the allowable height of buildings within <br />the Central Business District on what is commonly known as the Island. <br />Staff Comments: <br />The proposed amendment adds a new subsection that increases the maximum height for <br />buildings located between the St. Joseph River and East Race waterway to 150', but <br />maintains a maximum height of 60', or 5- stories, for properties zoned CBD that are east <br />of the East Race Waterway. The maximum height allowed for CBD properties west of the <br />river is unchanged. <br />The staff continues to be concerned about the maximum allowable height of buildings <br />zoned CBD east of the St. Joseph River. The Staff's position on this remains unchanged <br />from two previous requests to substantially increase the existing allowable maximum <br />height from 60' — the first as a part of the Commerce Center PUD rezoning request and <br />the second as a height variance request. <br />The Staff's position is based on the following actions: the adoption in 2004 of the zoning <br />ordinance that established distinct height differences between the east and west sides of <br />the river; the adoption of the East Bank Village Plan in 2008, and; the approval of two <br />height variances by the Area Board of Zoning; and the lack of any new planning process <br />seeking consensus on changes to the above mentioned plans. <br />Adoption of the 2004 Zoning Ordinance — The adoption of the ordinance was a <br />conscience decision to establish a different development character for the east bank area. <br />Prior to 2004, the majority of the east bank was zoned with a maximum allowable height <br />of 150', the same as the west bank. Contributing factors in establishing two maximum <br />height standards was the height of the Commerce Center Building (60'), the lower density <br />of the east bank area in general and the desire to maximize the use of the existing <br />infrastructure, such as the parking garages, in the core downtown area. On a broad policy <br />level basis, it is our opinion that those factors are still valid today. <br />East Bank Village Plan —The East Bank Village Master Plan, Phase 1, adopted in 2008, <br />was an amendment to City Plan, The Comprehensive Plan. The project narrative stated <br />that: "The East Race area would greatly benefit froth having its own unique identity and <br />should be re -named The East Bank Village (italics added). This branding of the <br />neighborhood has exciting potential and should strengthen its identity as being <br />independent of the Central Business District (italics added)." The combination of the <br />preferred modeling concept and sample illustrations clearly indicate, in our opinion, that a <br />APC 4 2812 -17 <br />Page 1 of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.