My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/27/72 Board of Public Works Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Public Works
>
Minutes
>
1972
>
03/27/72 Board of Public Works Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/15/2024 2:47:32 PM
Creation date
12/1/2016 11:54:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board of Public Works
Document Type
Minutes
Document Date
3/27/1972
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 25ti <br />3/27/72 <br />iVE - JAMES M.QUiLL ET AL <br />A petition was received from James M. Quili at al to vacate Oak Park <br />Drive from Oakridge Drive/Oak Park Drive intersection to the West <br />property line of 1817 Oak Park Drive, The following letter accompanied <br />the petition; <br />March 17, 1972 <br />Mr. Charles Sweeney, President <br />Board of Public Works and Safety <br />14th floor County City Building <br />South Bend, Indiana <br />Dear Chuck: <br />i wholeheartedly support the petition of the 'residents, who live on <br />Oakpark and Oakridge drives intersection, to vacate the dangerous <br />hill immediately east of said intersection. <br />The Oakpark and Oakridge intersection has been the scene of many <br />accidents which have resulted in many injuries and much property <br />damage. Four accidents have occurred since January 1 of this year. <br />The permanent vacation of the Oakpark Drive hill has simply become <br />a matter of public safety, <br />i also support the petitioners' request that the $75.00 fee to defray <br />the cost of advertising for the necessary public hearings be waived. <br />The vacation of the dangerous hill of Oakpark Drive is necessary for the <br />safety of the public and no specific benefit will accrue to the <br />petitioners. Enclosed is a copy of the letter from the City Legal <br />Department pertaining to the request to waive the $75.00 fee, <br />Thank you. <br />j vg <br />The Honorable Roger 0. Parent <br />Councilman - Fourth District <br />441 County City Building <br />South Bend, Indiana <br />Dear Roger: <br />Sincerely, <br />s/ Roger <br />Roger 0. Parent <br />March 10, 1972 <br />in response to your letter of March 6, 1972, although there is no <br />specific provision of law which answers your question, my conclusion <br />is that it Is within the discretion of the Board of Public Works and <br />Safety to waiver payment of costs if the Board determines that (1) <br />the vacation of the street is necessary to the public safety (not <br />simploy for the public benefit 2 no specific benefit will accrue <br />to the petitioners (I. e. petitioners are not motivated by personal <br />gail to be derived from the vacation,) <br />is a <br />However, because this/matter for:5determination by the Board of Public <br />W orks and Safety, I suggest that you present this question to the <br />Board with a copy of this letter attached, The Board will not, of <br />course, make a determination on this particular case.untii the <br />petition has been filed and the waiver request made but the Board <br />may provide you with the general principles to be applies. <br />KJB/j <br />Yours,very truly, <br />s/ Kevin Kevin J. Butler <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.