My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/10/73 Board of Public Works Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Public Works
>
Minutes
>
1973
>
09/10/73 Board of Public Works Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/15/2024 2:40:07 PM
Creation date
11/30/2016 12:38:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board of Public Works
Document Type
Minutes
Document Date
9/10/1973
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
.355 <br />REGULAR MEETING SEPTEM'BER 10, 1973 <br />RECOMMENDATION ON ENTRANCE TO LOT AT JEFFERSON BRIDGE APPROACH <br />The Board received the following recommendation: <br />TO: Board of Public Works <br />From: Clem Hazinski, Manager, Bureau of.Traffic and Lighting <br />Subject: Entrance to Lot at Jefferson Bridge Approach <br />A report by the Department of Redevelopment to the Board of Works on August <br />27, 1973 stated that the entrance to the parking lot northeast of the Royal <br />Inn, from a point just west of'the Jefferson Boulevard Bridge, is in use and <br />could possibly be used further as a haul road in -conjunction with the present <br />cut on Monroe Street just east of Columbia. <br />After investigation of the area by Mr. Rollin Farrand, Mr. William Slabaugh <br />and myself, it was concluded that an access point to the lot be constructed <br />on the east side of Columbia Street midway between Western Avenue and Monroe <br />Street. <br />Upon completion of construction of this access, it is recommended.that the <br />entrance on Jefferson, just west of the Bridge, and the entrance on East <br />Monroe Street be closed. Both of these entrances are hazardous and will <br />become worse as winter weather approaches. <br />Upon motion made, seconded and carried, the recommendation was approved. <br />STORE AT CORNER OF OLIVE AND ELWOOD <br />The Board received the following report on the business being operated at the <br />corner of Olive and Elwood: <br />September 7, 1973 <br />To: Board of Public Works <br />From: Clem Hazinski, Manager, Bureau of Traffic and Lighting <br />Subject: Store on the Corner of Olive and Elwood <br />In October of 1971, a plan to construct a building and certain aceess <br />points to a paved parking lot (as required by City Ordinance) was approved <br />by the City Engineering Department. The building was subsequently <br />erected by Mr. Edward Szczesniak at 2318 West Elwood to be used as a <br />retail store. <br />Since the building was erected and opened for business, there has been <br />no compliance to City requirements. <br />Inspection on September 6, 1973 revealed that only one driveway had. been, <br />constructed; the tree stumps have not been removed; there is no drywell <br />for drainage; the lot has not been paved (dusty conditions result) and <br />because no access has been installed according to the plan, vehicles are <br />driving over the sidewalk and curb onto Olive Street tracking gravel and <br />dirt from the unpaved lot onto the sidewalk and street. <br />Attached are copies of correspondence and Board action since July, 1972 <br />in chronological order. It is recommended that the Legal Department take <br />proper action to correct this situation. <br />This matter has been before the Board several times. Upon motion made, seconded <br />and carried, Mr. Hazinski's report was accepted and referred to James A. Roemer, <br />City Attorney, for action necessary to obtain compliance with City ordinances. <br />RECOMMENDATION FOR INSTALLATION OF STREET LIGHTS <br />The Board received the following recommendations from the Bureau of Traffic and <br />Lighting in regard to street light installations: <br />1. 900 E. Fairview. Install a 7;000L'MV OH WP @ $3.75/mo. or $45.00/yr. <br />Upon motion made, seconded and carried, the installation was approved. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.