My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/26/74 Board of Public Works Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Public Works
>
Minutes
>
1974
>
08/26/74 Board of Public Works Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/15/2024 2:39:48 PM
Creation date
11/29/2016 10:34:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board of Public Works
Document Type
Minutes
Document Date
8/26/1974
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 26, 1974 <br />Rose Court Apartment Site. Our findings are as follows: <br />1. The improvements as originally proposed are not complete. <br />The developer's request for acceptance should, therefore, <br />be considered a request for partial acceptance. <br />2. To date, the roadway and curbing are completed from <br />Riverside Drive to STA 3+58.44 (approximately 55% complete). <br />This portion of the improvement is recommended for acceptance. <br />3. The sanitary sewer work is completed. These sewer lines, <br />however, were found to be plugged and in need of cleaning. <br />It is. recommended that acceptance of the sanitary sewers be <br />conditioned upon said cleaning, to be performed by the <br />developer. His attention should be directed toward <br />sanitary manhole #3. <br />4. The storm sewer work has been completed. It is in acceptable <br />condition, except for the following: <br />a) Inlets I1 and I2 require cleaning. <br />b) The concrete headwall and apron were not constructed <br />in accordance with the original plan. It was located <br />approximately 55 feet away from its original designation, <br />which was at the edge of the water. The headwall and <br />apron are very unsightly due to the poor workmanship <br />employed in their construction. It is the recommendation <br />of this office that rip -rap be placed at the headwall <br />down to the low-water edge of the river. Said rip -rap <br />should be some type of stone, as opposed to broken <br />concrete. This rip -rap would serve to prevent any <br />erosion of the river bank between the apron and the <br />water's edge, as well as to serve to improve the <br />appearance of the structure. <br />c) The pavement replacement in Riverside Drive is not <br />acceptable. This patch should be removed and replaced <br />by the developer. <br />5. The sidewalks constructed along the South side of Rose <br />Court, from Riverside Drive for a distance of 340 feet <br />are acceptable. However, this length of sidewalk <br />represents only 27% of the original plan quantity. <br />To summarize, it is our recommendation that the completed improve- <br />ments be accepted by the City of South Bend, given that: <br />1) The above listed conditions are met. <br />2) The developer furnish the Board of Public Works <br />a Performance Bond or equivalent bond in the <br />amount of 100% of the incompleted portion of the <br />proposed site. This bond is estimated at $13,000.00. <br />Very truly yours, <br />s/ Rollin E. Farrand, P. E. <br />Director <br />s/ Patrick M. McMahon, Manager <br />Bureau of Public Construction <br />Upon motion nade, seconded and carried, the Board,approved the <br />recommendation and referred it to the Bureau of Design and Adminis- <br />tration for further action. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.