My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/17/77 Board of Public Works Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Public Works
>
Minutes
>
1977
>
10/17/77 Board of Public Works Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/15/2024 2:37:49 PM
Creation date
11/22/2016 10:41:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board of Public Works
Document Type
Minutes
Document Date
10/17/1977
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
REGULAR MEETING <br />OCTOBER 17, 1977 <br />property owners pay a high property tax and should not have to pay <br />for the luxury of one resident. She then asked if Councilman <br />Taylor was present. Mr. McMahon said he was not. She asked the <br />Board what happened to the tax money collected in the Crest Manor <br />area and why the owners should have to pay for the sewer construction. <br />She said their taxes should pay for that. She said this area does <br />not receive other City services, such as snow removal and leaf <br />pick-up. Mr. McMahon stated that other City services were not a <br />consideration at this hearing and any complaints should be called to <br />the attention of the proper Department. This hearing concerns only <br />the proposal to construct sanitary sewers. Mr. Capps, 5624 Raleigh <br />Drive, told the Board that he had a septic system installed at his <br />own expense and he felt it was a burden to the property owners to <br />be hooked up to this system. He said there is only one person who <br />wants this sewer. He said he did not think this was the right thing <br />for the City to do. Mrs. Jagmin asked how the Board determined the <br />footage to be assessed and noted that her assessment was one of the <br />largest on the list. Mr, McMahon pointed out that State law determines <br />how the assessment is to be made for such improvements and it is based <br />on square footage of the property. He noted that, if the project is <br />approved, the Board will advertise for bids and award a contract. <br />If the finalconstruction cost is less than the estimate, each <br />assessment will be lowered accordingly. If the final figure is higher <br />than the estimate, the City will have to absorb ithe additional cost. <br />A property owner's assessment cannot be higher than the figure listed <br />on the prelimary assessment roll on file with the Board. Mr. Finley, <br />5633 Abshire Drive, asked if the assessment must be paid in cash <br />immediately. David A. Wells, Manager of the Bureau of Design and <br />Administration, responded that the property owner will be notified <br />by the County Treasurer's Office of the total amount of the assessment <br />and can then pay the amount due in full or, by signing a waiver, can <br />elect to pay the amount in five yearly installments, billed with the <br />property tax statements at a six per cent interest rate. Mr. Fogarty, <br />1219 Berkshire Drive, asked if.the property owners will be billed for <br />sewage charges if the sewers are constructed . Mr. McMahon said if <br />the sewers are constructed, the residents will be billed the minimum <br />sewage charge per month. Victor Jagmin, 5644 Raleigh Drive, said that <br />area residents did not want to be annexed and went to many meetings <br />with City officials to state their views. The City annexed the area <br />over the protests of the property owners. He said the City should <br />have approached the people about sewers before they put in their own <br />systems. He said he paid $1500 to put in a dry well because a family <br />has put in a swimming pool and his property is below theirs. Mr. <br />McMahon then called for any further comments from property owners <br />present. He said he could call the names of the property owners <br />listed on the Assessment Roll and ask the owners to vote for or against <br />the sewer project. The following response was noted: <br />Mengel, 5616 Raleigh Drive <br />Not Present <br />Capps, 5624 Raleigh Drive <br />No <br />Kirwan, 5638 Raleigh Drive <br />No <br />agmin, 5644 Raleigh Drive <br />No <br />Fogarty, 1219 Berkshire Drive <br />No <br />Gutknecht, 1227 Berkshire Drive <br />Yes <br />Finley, 5633 Abshire Drive <br />Yes <br />Cantwell, 2625 Abshire Drive <br />Not Present <br />Jack Hickey & Associates <br />Not Present <br />The vote tally indicated two "yes", four "no" and three "not present" <br />The Clerk was directed to contact those property owners not present <br />to ask them to make their views regarding the sewer construction <br />known to the Board, in writing, by Monday, October 24, 1977 at which <br />time the Board will determine the wishes of the majority of the <br />property owners involved. Mr. McMahon made a motion to table action <br />on the Improvement Resolution until Monday, October 24, 1977 at the <br />regular meeting of the Board. Mr. Brunner seconded the motion and <br />it carried. <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.