My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/25/77 Board of Public Works Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Public Works
>
Minutes
>
1977
>
07/25/77 Board of Public Works Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/15/2024 2:40:42 PM
Creation date
11/22/2016 9:49:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board of Public Works
Document Type
Minutes
Document Date
7/25/1977
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Rio <br />REGULAR MEETING JULY 25, 1977 <br />that the Board deny the vacatiom.-`petition.or delay it until there <br />is compliance with any conditions established for screening. <br />Mr. Ludwick, President of the Park Avenue Neighborhood Association, <br />said that for eight years the association has attempted to get the <br />hospital to put in proper screening of their parking lots. Mr. <br />McMahon said the ordinance requires screening where there are <br />residences directly across from the parking areas and asked whether <br />there were houses on Navarre. Mr. Ludwick said there were not. <br />Mr. John Horan, 304 W. Navarre, said that Mrs. Frank lives in the <br />house back of the office at the corner of Navarre and Lafayette. <br />Mr. Hammerschmidt pointed out that this is commercial property. -Mr. <br />Horan said lights from cars in the parking area on Navarre shine into <br />his house. Mrs. Sponholz and Mrs. Pepple both advised the Board <br />that they consider the parking areas an eyesore. Mr. Brunner noted <br />that there is no legal requirement that the hospital screen areas <br />which do not face residences and pointed out that the hospital did <br />screen on Lafayette. The issue now becomes whether they should <br />screen on Navarre and Bartlett. He said it would appear that the <br />character.of the neighborhood is private residential. He then asked <br />hospital spokesmen if they planned to screen on Navarre and Bartlett. <br />Mr. Hammerschmidt said they did not plan to screen on those streets <br />for reasons of safety and the protection of female employees, particu- <br />larly those who work the night shift and have to go to the parking <br />area when they leave work. These employees object to screening <br />because -It--provides a hiding place for individuals in those lots at <br />night. The hospital felt they could live with screening on Lafayette <br />and with guardrails on Navarre and Bartlett. Mr. Brunner said <br />screening two or three feet high would not present a security problem <br />and suggested that shrubbery at a low height would eliminate the <br />guardrails to which the residents object. Mr. Hammerschmidt suggested <br />that the residents object to seeing the automobiles in the lots and <br />said a low guardrail was being considered. Mr. Ludwick said the screen- <br />ing should be as high as the headlights on automobiles. Mr. McMahon <br />asked the hospital representatives if they would consider screening <br />on Navarre and Bartlett as a consideration of this vacation. He <br />said it is the feeling of the Board that some type of screening would <br />be consistent with protecting the residential quality of the neighbor- <br />hood. Mr. Mullen asked why the hospital had considered a guard rail <br />instead of shrubbery. Mr. Trenkner said bushes are hard to maintain: <br />Automobiles can hit them and they have to be replaced. The cost of <br />the shrubbery is one reason they have considered guardrails. He said <br />they could put wheel stops along the perimeter of the area without <br />trying to maintain hedges. Mr. Trenkner pointed out that this is a <br />community hospital and they do not have unlimited funds at their <br />disposal. They are trying to go with the method which is most <br />economical. Mr. Ludwick suggested that they consider the type of <br />fence and screening used for the doctor's parking lot on Main Street. <br />Per. Trenkner pointed that this is a different type of area and the <br />fence is for retaining purposes. Marchmont Kovas, South Bend Tribune, <br />asked if they could give the number of persons mugged or attacked <br />at night in the parking areas. Mr. Hammerschmidt said he did not <br />know the number but said there have been incidents and the hospital <br />is concerned for the female employees. Mr. Brunner pointed out that <br />if the residential character of the neighborhood is changed, this would <br />have a direct effect on crime in the area, which would undoubtedly <br />increase. He said both the residents of the neighborhood and <br />Memorial Hospital have a vested interest in seeing the character of <br />the neighborhood maintained. Mr. Trenkner said the hospital has <br />improved the neighborhood by removing some boarding houses that were <br />in bad condition and they intend to continue improving the area. He <br />noted that they had made arrangements with Rieth Riley to begin <br />the paving work but had no control over the strike which delayed the <br />start of the work. He said they have every intention of completing <br />the work on the parking areas and doing it right. Mr. Hammerschmidt <br />pointed out that the work can be completed as soon as the vacation <br />of the alleys has been accomplished. Mr. Brunner suggested that <br />screening of some sort should be made a condition of the vacation and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.