Laserfiche WebLink
397 <br />REGULAR MEETING <br />AUGUST 30. 1982 <br />CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING AND RECOMMENDATION - VACATION OF <br />MADISON STREET, ST. PETER STREET AND ALLEY (ST. JOSEPH MEDICAL CENTER) <br />Mr. Leszczynski stated that the Board had continued the public hear- <br />ing on the proposed vacation of Madison Street, St. Peter Street <br />and the westerly portion.of the east -west alley between St, Louis <br />and St. Peter Street as petitioned by St. Joseph's Medical Center <br />from the August 23rd meeting of the Board in an effort to meet <br />with hospital personnel and the residents and affected businesses <br />in the vicinity of the hospital to try and resolve some of their <br />concerns. A meeting had, therefore, been held on.August 26th <br />at the hopsital. Mr. John Ford, Attorney at Law, 1800 American <br />National Bank Building, introduced Mr. Donald Larimore, Senior <br />Vice President of the Medical. Center. Mr. Larimore referred to <br />a drawing of the facility and surrounding area which highlighted <br />the hospital's plans for the $20 million expansion program. Mr, <br />Larimore stated that a part of the plan called for the expansion <br />of the front entrance of the facility and a drive -through at that <br />entrance off the proposed vacated portion of Madison and St. <br />Peter Streets. In addition, a portion of the east -west alley <br />�. between St. Louis and St. Peter Streets was being requested to <br />accommodate parking. Mr. Larimore explained that, as a result <br />(29 of the meeting on August 26th, the hospital addressed the <br />concern of the businesses fronting on LaSalle Street in the area <br />Q of the alley proposed to be vacated and, because of their concern <br />for delivery access, easements would be given for use of the <br />vacated alley which would cross the hospital's parking lot. Mr. <br />James Nafe, Attorney at Law, 320 West Jefferson, representing <br />the Western and Southern Life Insurance Company which owned <br />property at the northeast_ corner of St. Peter and LaSalle <br />Streets, advised that the vacation of the alley portion was not <br />a concern to his client and the easements to be granted to the <br />businesses on LaSalle Street had no effect on the insurance <br />company's objection to the vacation of Madison Street and St. <br />Peter Street.. He stated that a street vacation was a very <br />definite and final action and his client was concerned about the <br />accessibility of its property for its customers and employees if <br />the only access to the parking lot was off LaSalle and St. Peter <br />Streets. He objected to the creation of a dead-end street, and <br />stated that all traffic which normally utilized Madison Street <br />would now have to use LaSalle and there would only be one way <br />in which the customers and employees of Western and Southern <br />Life would have access to the office facility. Mr. Larimore <br />pointed out that, as far as traffic was concerned, the hospital <br />presently had three major entrances into its parking areas and <br />the proposed plan was to primarily generate traffic coming into <br />the facility on St. Peter Street from LaSalle and direct all <br />traffic to the three exits so that St. Peter would carry only <br />traffic coming into the facility. He explained that the shift <br />changes were such that the heaviest traffic into the facility <br />would occur prior to normal business hours and during business <br />hours thus alleviating congestion. Councilwoman Beverlie Beck <br />stated that the Council's Residential Neighborhood Committee of <br />which she was chairwoman had become involved in the proposed <br />vacation because of some of the concerns of the residents and <br />business establishments in the viciniiy of the hospital. She <br />stated that she had attended the meeting held on August 26th <br />at the hospital and as she saw it, the concerns were mainly the <br />excessive traffic on LaSalle and the fact that it would increase <br />with the closing of Madison Street; the concern about water <br />run-off from the hospital's property; why the entrance expansion <br />could not be constructed to the east of the hospital where space <br />was available rather than closing Madison Street; and the concern <br />of adjacent businesses as to accessibility to their properties <br />from the north. Mr. Leszczynski asked Mr. Larimore if the <br />hospital had considered the possibility of constructing a parking <br />garage extending out over Madison rather than closing the street. <br />Mr. Larimore stated that it had been determined such construction <br />would not be feasible because of the high cost involved. He <br />stated that the cost of structured parking was four times as <br />