My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/02/1981 Board of Public Works Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Public Works
>
Minutes
>
1981
>
11/02/1981 Board of Public Works Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/15/2024 2:37:04 PM
Creation date
11/2/2016 10:48:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board of Public Works
Document Type
Minutes
Document Date
11/2/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
115 <br />REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 2, 1981 <br />necessitated because of severe damage caused to it by recent <br />heavy rains. He stated that funds have been appropriated for <br />this purpose. Upon a motion made by Mr. Leszczynski, seconded <br />by Mr. Hill and carried, the request to advertise for bids was <br />approved and the title sheet signed. <br />APPROVE REQUEST TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS - SALE OF ABANDONED VEHICLES <br />Mr. Leszczynski stated that, in accordance with the Cou.ncil's <br />newly adopted ordinance dealing with abandoned vehicles, the <br />disposal of said vehicles would be handled by the Board of Works <br />rather than the Board of Safety as had previously been done. <br />He submitted a request from Katherine Barnard, Director of the <br />Neighborhood Code Enforcement Office, for the sale of 17 <br />abandoned vehicles, 13 of which were valued at over $100.. He <br />advised that all the vehicles have been stored at Steve and <br />Gene's Impoundment Lot, 3109 South Gertrude Street, for more <br />than the required 30 days, identification checks have been run <br />for auto theft, and the owners and lien holders have been <br />notified. Upon a motion made by Mr. Hill, seconded by Mr. <br />Kernan and carried, the request to advertise for bids was <br />approved, with sealed bids to be received on November 16, 1981. <br />PUBLIC HEARINGS SET FOR STREET AND ALLEY VACATIONS <br />ON NOVEMBER 9, 1981 <br />Q <br />Mr. Leszczynski explained that as of September 1, 1981, the <br />date on which the Home Town Rule became effective, the Common <br />Council would have jurisdiction on all street and alley vacations. <br />Accordingly, the Council adopted an ordinance setting forth <br />procedures to handle the vacations which consisted of the Board <br />of Works submitting a recommendation to the Council concerning <br />each vacation. Mr. Leszczynski suggested that, in order for <br />the Board to provide the Council with a thorough recommendation, <br />public hearings be scheduled before the Board so that considera- <br />tion could be given to all the affects of the proposed vacations <br />on abutting properties. He stated that, in addition, comments <br />would be forthcoming to the Board from the Engineering Department, <br />Area Plan Commission and Community Development Department <br />concerning the vacations. Upon a motion made by Mr. Leszczynski, <br />seconded by Mr. Hill and carried, public hearings were scheduled <br />for Monday, November 9, 1981, at 9:30 a.m., for the vacation of <br />a portion of Sunnymede Avenue,, -and George Avenue and surrounding <br />alleys in the Monroe -Sample Development Area. The Clerk was <br />instructed to mail certified notices to abutting property owners. <br />Mr. Stephen Drendall, a petitioner for the vacation of a portion <br />of Sunnymede Avenue, stated that he had been advised that the <br />Engineering Department would be making a preliminary unfavorable <br />recommendation to the Board concerning that vacation. He asked <br />that members of the Engineering Department make an inspection <br />of the property to see the existing use of same rather than <br />considering a recommendation simply by referring to the plat <br />maps. He felt that the petition, in light of what has happened <br />to the surrounding property, should be considered favorably. <br />Mr. Leszczynski stated that, regardless of the current physical <br />condition of the property, the vacation ofonly a portion of <br />Sunnymede Avenue would create a dead-end of a public street <br />and could possibly adversely affect future property owners. <br />Mr. Drendall stated that it appeared some lots would be.land- <br />locked, but, in reality,they would not be. Mr. Leszczynski <br />explained that that was the purpose of the Board scheduling a <br />public hearing on the matter. He stated that the Board wanted <br />to thoroughly review the petition and receive comments from <br />affected property owners before submitting its recommendation <br />to the Common Council. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.