Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING <br />DECEMBER 3, 1984 <br />also inquired why the designation of transfer station was removed <br />from the original license application. He was advised, that <br />pursuant to discussions held at the Board meeting held on <br />November 26, 1984, the issue of a transfer station was discussed <br />and it was determined that that designation should be eliminated <br />from the application. Mr. Gerschoffer inquired if the Board <br />could ask the applicant for some type of commitment that he will <br />not go into the trash business as in the past Mr. Collier has <br />changed his mind regarding the type of business to be operated. <br />In response, Mr. Fedder and Mr. Leszczynski advised that the <br />Board Resolution considered for adoption this date, addressed <br />that issue and that the applicant is limited to the type of <br />recycling operation outlined in the Resolution. Should another <br />type of operation wish to be conducted, the applicant would have <br />to reapply to the Board. Should the applicant change the type of <br />operation and not reapply, the operation will be closed down. <br />Board Attorney Carolyn V. Pfotenhauer advised that what the Board <br />is required to do is make a recommendation to the Common Council <br />whether or not a recycling operation license should be granted. <br />In order to do that, the Board must receive favorable <br />recommendations from the Department of Code Enforcement and the <br />Fire Prevention Bureau. Both of those departments did give <br />favorable recommendations subject to certain building and fire <br />code violations being corrected. The Board is now in a position <br />to make a determination. Further, any recommendation that the <br />Board would make would be limited to there being approval by the <br />Board of Zoning Appeals for the recycling of materials and <br />recycling limited to selected industrial waste and for no other <br />purpose. <br />Mr. Gerschoffer inquired of Board members if they inspected the <br />premises at 1100 Prairie Avenue which is proposed for this <br />recycling operation. Board Attorney Carolyn V. Pfotenhauer <br />advised Mr. Gerschoffer that it is the responsibility of the <br />Department of Code Enforcement and the Fire Prevention Bureau to <br />do the inspections and provide the Board with a report and <br />recommendation. Mr. Leszczynski and Mr. Vance did' -state however <br />that they are familiar with the building and have -been in it in <br />the past for other reasons. <br />Ms. Pfotenhauer advised that the Board at this time can recommend <br />to the Common Council that the license be granted only after all <br />building and fire code violations, approval of building plans, <br />and compliance with all state and local occupancy requirements <br />and receipt of an Occupancy Permit from the City are secured. <br />Mr. Frank Kuminecz, 1534 South Nash Street, South Bend, Indiana, <br />was present and addressed the Board. Mr. Kuminecz stated that he <br />is against the City granting approval to the applicant to conduct <br />the recycling operation known as Something of Value, Inc. and <br />believes it is a mistake to grant approval. He stated that he <br />believes that there is no way they can comply with the code <br />violations as the building has been idle for twenty-one years. <br />There being no one else present wishing to speak either for or <br />against this license application, upon a motion made by Mr. <br />Leszczynski, seconded by Mr. Vance and carried, the following <br />Resolution No. 25-1984 was adopted: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 25-1984 <br />WHEREAS, a license application for a recycling operation <br />has been received by the Board of Public Works; and <br />