My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/10/84 Board of Public Works Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Public Works
>
Minutes
>
1984
>
09/10/84 Board of Public Works Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/15/2024 2:33:23 PM
Creation date
10/31/2016 9:36:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board of Public Works
Document Type
Minutes
Document Date
9/10/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br />•• <br />REGULAR MEETING <br />SEPTEMBER 10, 1984 <br />APPROVE CONTRACTOR'S BONDS <br />Mr. Joseph J. Pluta, P.E., and Mr. Melvin B. Humphrey, Engineering <br />Department, recommended that the following Contractor's Bonds <br />be approved: <br />Craig McClellan <br />Effective:. September 10, 1984 <br />Herschel Willis <br />d/b/a H.R. Willis Construction Company <br />Effective September 10 1984 <br />Upon a motion made by Mr. Leszczynski, seconded by Mr. Vance and <br />carried, the above Contractor's Bonds were approved. <br />FILING OF STREET LIGHT OUTAGE REPORT <br />The report submitted to the Board indicates a total of twenty-eight <br />(28) outages for the period August 4, 1984 to September 6, 1984. <br />Upon a motion made by Mr. Leszczynski, seconded by Mr. Vance and <br />carried, the report was filed. <br />APPROVE CLAIMS <br />Mr. Elroy J. Kelzenberg, Executive Director, St. Joseph County Job <br />Training Program, submitted two (2) lists containing thirty-nine <br />(39) claims and recommended approval. Additionally, City Controller <br />Michael L. Vance submitted Claim Docket No. 16992 through Claim <br />Docket No. 17561 and recommended approval. Upon a motion made by <br />Mr. Leszczynski, seconded by Mr. Hill and carried, the claims were <br />approved and the reports filed. <br />PRIVILEGE OF THE FLOOR: <br />QUESTIONS AND CONCERNS OF COUNCILMAN JOHN VOORDE CONCERNING <br />THE GIFT OF THE CITY -OWNED BUILDING AT 622 NORTH MICHIGAN <br />STREET TO THE REAL SERVICES PROGRAM <br />Councilman John Voorde was present at the meeting and addressed <br />the Board. Mr. Voorde asked for a clarification on the status <br />of Mayor Parent's intention to give the Real Services building <br />located at 622 North Michigan Street to that agency. It was <br />noted that in a meeting with Council members on August 30, 1984, <br />Mayor Parent stated that he would like to give the Real Services <br />Program the City -owned building which they are currently operating <br />and leasing.from the City at the cost of $1.00 per year. Mr. <br />Voorde asked for a clarification of the matter as he stated that <br />it was left open-ended after the meeting with the Mayor. Mr. Voorde- <br />asked if it was true that all it would require is action by this <br />Board to transfer title to Real Services and if so what is the <br />timetable the City is looking at for this transfer? He further <br />stated that when the building was originally appraised many years <br />ago it was then undervalued at $150,000.00 and would probably be <br />worth many more times that amount today and wondered if it was in <br />the best interests of the City to give the building away. He <br />stated that the Mayor explained that giving the building to Real <br />Services would re-emphasize the City's committment to the older <br />adults of the community and the Peal Services Program but wondered <br />if giving away the building was necessary in order to do that. <br />In response to Mr. Voorde, Mr. Hill stated that the Board can dis- <br />pose of the building. Also,: as Real Services is a not -for -profit <br />agency, and as the property disposal statute pertaining to not -for - <br />profits would apply, the City would not have to go through the <br />appraisal process or fair market value of the property but can <br />dispose of it however the Board determines. He stated that it is <br />the Mayor's feelings that if the property should be sold, the Real <br />Services Program and not the City should reap the benefits. Mr. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.