Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING MARCH 29, 2016 <br />Kids strongly supports this ordinance and this bill is set up properly by presenting a <br />comprehensive ordinance that provides exceptions to certain industries. This protects all workers <br />and all businesses. The stumbling points for other city ordinances in the past is providing <br />exceptions to some work places, by not having that this ordinance is better written. By saying <br />this a threat to all workers and protecting all workers equally that problem is avoided. In all the <br />cases he has been a part of where the ordinance was written comprehensively like this they have <br />been upheld fully. This bill has been reviewed by three (3) independent attorneys and all have <br />found this proposed law one that would hold up against a legal challenge. Regarding e- cigarettes, <br />while they are a relatively new product, a third of the states that have comprehensive smoke free <br />laws include e- cigarettes in their smoke free laws. There is no question based on the evidence <br />today that e- cigarettes are safer than normal cigarettes but that does not mean that they are safe. <br />This would help rid all workplaces of pollutants and carcinogens. Based on the current science, <br />all major health organizations recommend e- cigarettes be included in smoke free laws. <br />Economically what the data shows is what usually happens is that for a month or so after these <br />laws there is a little bit of a blip in revenue for these bars but then that city goes back on <br />whatever trend it was on before. If business was going up it continues to go up, if business was <br />going down it continues-to go down, unfortunately for Elkhart that was the situation they were in <br />when they passed that law. You should look at the empirical data if you want good data. No <br />matter where this fight takes place it is always the same fight, the health community comes out <br />and talks about public health while the business community comes out and talks about their fears <br />of losing business but the reality is five (5) or ten (10) years from now all of you who vote for <br />this ordinance will look back and say it's one of the best things you did as councilmembers. Also <br />if past experience is any indication a good chunk of people wearing the red shirts (opposition) <br />will have changed their mind too. <br />Traci Kennedy, Columbia Missouri, she works for an organization titled Americans for Non <br />Smoker's Rights. All workers deserve the right to breathe clean air at work no matter where they <br />work. This is a public health issue but also there is a negative economic impact on South Bend <br />due to second hand smoke. The reality is the Tobacco Industry are spending $288 million dollars <br />to recruit Indiana youth to become addicted to their products and they are not offering to recoup <br />the cost for building fires, maintenance and cleaning, and worker's sick leave. They are not <br />offering any assistance to these businesses that then have to foot the bill to pay for exposure to <br />smoke and secondhand smoke. We know that smoke free laws save both lives and money for the <br />communities they are enacted in and they are not only popular in the beginning but they also <br />grow in popularity over time after being enacted. <br />Nick Torez, works for the American Lung Association in Indianapolis, spoke about the questions <br />regarding Elkhart. At the request of Councilmember Ferlic they reached out to the Alcohol and <br />Tobacco Commission for the state of Indiana to request data to show the alcohol permits for the <br />city of Elkhart. In the short time they have had they have tried to compare the data from the state <br />to the list provided by the opponents of the ordinance. There are several discrepancies on the list <br />provided by the opponents and this goes to the question of relying on anecdotal evidence to base <br />some of these decisions on. In particular several of the bars listed on the sheet are still listed by <br />the state as having active liquor licenses and several were listed as having gone out of business <br />before the ordinance was enacted in Elkhart. It calls into question some of the anecdotes we have <br />been asked to rely on. Also this sheet does not show any of the new bars opened in Elkhart since <br />the ordinance passed. Manufacturing was a huge loss for Elkhart during the recession and that <br />had an enormous impact on the bar industry there. The Elkhart Truth posted a moving article <br />about the effects of the recession in Elkhart and quoted one of the bar owners after the ordinance <br />went into effect saying business had been very hard but he did not cite the smoking ordinance he <br />cited that all of the shift workers from the manufacturing sector were out of work. To answer <br />Councilmember Oliver Davis's question the Indianapolis ordinance covers ninety -two (92) <br />percent of the population of Marion County. <br />Latonya Green, 1028 Ebeling Dr. South Bend IN., stated it is clear the dangers of secondhand <br />smoke fifty -nine (59) people from our community will die each year due to secondhand smoke. <br />We must honor their memory by protecting all workers regardless of where they work. All <br />residents of South Bend deserve to work, study and play in a smoke free environment. This <br />ordinance will not only protect health immediately it will also motivate people to quit smoking <br />0 <br />