Laserfiche WebLink
5. <br />The vacuum system is powered by the chassis engine. This does not allow for the unit <br />to maintain a constant full vacuum while in the drive mode. <br />Other areas <br />that are not to specification: <br />1. <br />Vac -Con uses (3) steel fans instead of (2) aluminum fans. <br />2. <br />The pick-up hose rotation gear driven not hydraulic as specified. <br />3. <br />4. <br />Rear engine gauges are on traffic side of vehicle. <br />No emergency vacuum cut off at operators station. <br />The Clean Earth Model 0910 does not meet the advertised specifications in over thirty (30) areas. <br />By not meeting our specifications, they compromise operator safety, and is less productive. Below <br />is a partial list <br />of the areas where it does not meet specifications. <br />1. <br />Brown Equipment did not include an exception list as required by the specifications. <br />This has caused many hours of extra work. <br />2. <br />Single engine, not dual engine machine. This unit cannot maintain constant vacuum <br />in the drive mode. <br />3. <br />Positive displacement blower, not centrifugal compressor vacuum pump. <br />4. <br />Vacuum pump driven by belts, not hydraulic. <br />5. <br />Debris body does not meet minimum strength specifications. <br />6. <br />Water tanks are mounted above the frame rails, not below. <br />7. <br />Water system cannot be operated independent of the Vacuum system. There is no <br />explanation of the water pump drive system. <br />8. <br />Hose reel does not have automatic wind guide. <br />Along with these are many other areas where the Clean Earth does not meet specifications. Also the <br />truck chassis bid by Brown Equipment does not meet the specification for frame strength or proper <br />transmission. Therefore, Mr. Caldwell made a motion that the recommendation be accepted and the <br />bid be awarded as outlined above. Ms. Roemer seconded the motion which carried. <br />AWARD QUOTATION - PALAIS ROYALE DEBRIS REMOVAL <br />Ms. Denise Chamber, Morris Civic, advised the Board that on June 9, 1997, quotations were received <br />and opened for the above referred to project. After reviewing those bids, Ms. Chambers recommends <br />that the Board award the contract to Insulco Asbestos Management, Inc., 1408 Elwood, South Bend, <br />Indiana the amount of $2,230.00. Therefore, Mr. Littrell made a motion that the recommendation <br />be accepted and the bids be awarded as outlined above. Ms. Roemer seconded the motion which <br />carried. <br />APPROVE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT - MCKINLEY PLAZA SANITARY SEWER <br />EXTENSION - PROJECT NO. 97-59 <br />Mr. Caldwell advised that in accordance with the bid awarded on July 7, 1997, to Small, Inc., 25190 <br />State Road 4, North Liberty, Indiana, in the amount of $31,000.00 for the above referred to project, <br />a Contract in said amount was being submitted for Board approval. Upon a motion made by Mr. <br />Littrell, seconded by Ms. Roemer and carried, the Contract was approved. <br />APPROVE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT - BROADWAY - REMOVAL OF ST. JOSEPH AND <br />CARROLL STREETS AND SITE PREPARATION - PROJECT NO 97-33-1 <br />Mr. Caldwell advised that in accordance with the bid awarded on July 7, 1997, to Kaser Spraker <br />Construction, 25487 West State Road 2, South Bend, Indiana, in the amount of $64,734.00 for the <br />above referred to project, a Contract in said amount was being submitted for Board approval. Upon <br />a motion made by Mr. Littrell, seconded by Ms. Roemer and carried, the Contract was approved. <br />APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT - PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - <br />SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION - PROJECT NO 96-26 <br />Mr. Caldwell stated that the Board is in receipt of an Amendment to an Agreement between the City <br />of South Bend and Ken Herceg and Associates, 211 West Washington, South Bend, Indiana, for <br />additional services to the original Agreement, which was approved on April 21, 1997. Mr. Caldwell <br />noted that the Amendment to the Agreement is in the additional amount of $26,110.00, for a new <br />Agreement sum of $59,810.00. Therefore, upon a motion made by Mr. Caldwell, seconded by Ms. <br />Roemer and carried, the Amendment to the Agreement was approved and executed. <br />