Laserfiche WebLink
In Indiana currently, the General Assembly prepares and adopts redistricting plans. The problem <br />with this method is that the players are the umpires. Having elected officials draw the maps <br />encourages gerrymandering. Partisan gerrymandering is the practice of drawing districts to <br />benefit a particular party or candidate. Both Democrats and Republicans engage in <br />gerrymandering; the party in power draws the maps. Ms. Pawelski explained depending on how <br />the districts are drawn you can get very different results from the same votes. These <br />gerrymandered districts lead to malapportionment, which is bad or inequitable apportionment in <br />a political'assembly. Ms. Pawelski gave examples of both instances in 2012 where Democrats <br />would cast more votes than Republicans in a state and end up losing more elections and also <br />examples where Republicans cast more votes in a state but ended up losing more elections. <br />Legislatures create malapportionment, in states where Republicans controlled the process, their <br />candidates won roughly 53 percent of the vote and 72 percent of the seats. In the states where <br />Democrats controlled the process, their candidates won about 56 percent of the vote and 71 <br />percent of the seats. <br />Commissions reduce this problem. In states where courts, commissions or divided governments <br />drew the maps, there was a much smaller disparity between the share of the popular vote and the <br />number of seats won in Congress. In those states, Democrats won slightly more than half the <br />vote and 56 percent of the seats and Republicans won 46 percent of the vote and 44 percent of <br />the seats. <br />In Indiana, Republicans generally win between 53 percent and 57 percent of the votes in state <br />legislative races, but they have drawn the maps with such surgical precision that they now find <br />themselves with 71 percent and 80 percent of the seats in the Indiana House and Senate, <br />respectively. <br />The negative consequences of gerrymandering are vast. In 2014, 44 of 100 House candidates and <br />10 of 25 Senate candidates ran unopposed. It discourages voting, Indiana's 2014 voter turnout <br />was 28 %, the lowest in the nation. Gerrymandering can also splinter and harm communities of <br />interest such as cities and towns, school districts, neighborhoods, and minorities. It is time for <br />voters to pick their politicians and not politicians pick their voters. <br />Councilmember Jo M. Broden asked about the makeup of this proposed commission. <br />Ms. Pawelski responded the commission would be led by citizens. Some states have politicians <br />involved and some have strictly citizens only. <br />Councilmember Oliver Davis asked how the citizens would be chosen and if they would have to <br />be bi- partisan because just because they are not a politician does not mean they are not biased. <br />Ms. Pawelski sated the resolution does not flesh that out but clearly they would be politically <br />active and informed people but it would be bi- partisan so it would be fair and equal in numbers. <br />Ms. Pawelski provided the PowerPoint she used for her presentation and it is on file in the City <br />Clerk's Office. <br />2 <br />