Laserfiche WebLink
COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT <br />Jeff Gibney, Director, Community & Economic Development Department, though <br />absent, submitted a letter for the Council outlining the cuts and re-organization that. <br />hopefully will allow Community & Economic Development to operate effectively within <br />budget guidelines. The attached letter #1, emphasizes the economies found as early as <br />'08 in anticipation of the pending crisis. Councilmember Henry Davis interjected, asking <br />how effective a job creation effort had been over the last couple of years. Beth Leonard <br />of Community & Economic Development responded saying all efforts and corresponding <br />measurable results were found in the Departments Annual Report. Don Inks stated that <br />Project Future and the Chamber of Commerce were partners with Community and <br />Economic Development in job creation and retention. This led Karen White and Tim <br />Rouse to ask how much money we give to Project Future and whether these dollars were <br />well spent. The administration promised to review and report at a later date. <br />CODE ENFORCEMENT <br />Catherine Toppel began by recounting actions already taken to approach the nearly half- <br />million dollars her department was asked to cut. This dollar amount includes over <br />$200,000 already cut from'08 operating expenses. Most notably, Code eliminated take <br />homes cars, cut hours and cut pay to meet expected shortfalls Code's efforts as well as <br />those of other departments reviewed in today's hearings are proved in attachment #2. <br />Each Councilmember in turn, Rouse, Henry Davis, Oliver Davis and White had questions <br />and concerns relating to the departments ability to continue quality services under these <br />stressful financial conditions. <br />LEGAL DEPARTMENT <br />City Attorney Chuck Leone made the presentation for his department. He stated the <br />department goal was to cut 2010 personnel costs by 24% compared to 2009. This would <br />be accomplished, in part, by allocating costs to other funds when providing services and <br />by eliminating paid legal interns. He noted in comparison to other larger cities in Indiana <br />South Bend not only compares favorably; but even spends less in total legal fees than <br />others. By keeping work "in house" considerable savings are realized annually he said. <br />Councilmember Rouse rose to say this good effort needs to be told. <br />