Laserfiche WebLink
~1 ~! <br />2010 BUDGET HEARINGS <br />PERSONNEL AND FINANCE COMMITTEE JULY 28, 2009 <br />The July 28, 2009 Personnel and Finance Committee Meeting was called to order by its <br />Chairperson Tom LaFountain at 5:03 p.m. <br />Committee Member's in Attendance: Karen L. White; David Varner <br />Other Council Member's: Derek Dieter; Ann Puzzello; Tim Rouse; Henry Davis; Al <br />"Buddy" Kirsits <br />Other's Present: Gary Gilot; Catherine Fanello; Chuck Leone; John Murphy; Catherine <br />Toppel; MaryAnn Myers; Kathleen Cekanski-Farrand; Jeff Parrott; Jeff Gibney; Tom <br />Price; Mikki Dobski; Aladean DeRose; Jerry Niezgodski <br />AGENDA: MAYOR'S OPENING REMARKS/BUDGET OVERVIEW <br />Chairperson Tom LaFountain opened the 2010 budget review process by recognizing <br />Mayor Luecke who put the budget review in context. The Mayor began by announcing <br />some "good News" just received from the federal government. He said that as a part of <br />the federal stimulus package the city would receive a grant of nearly $2.5 million to <br />retain 13 police officers through a 3 year grant. The only stipulation being the need to <br />retain the officers for 12 months after the grant expires. Details of the award are in an <br />attached press release dated 7-28-09. The Mayor went on to say the city had also grant <br />applications in process to retain fire-fighters. He went on to describe the challenges of <br />putting together a budget for 2010 when 2008 revenues from property taxes and'09 rates <br />and revenues have yet to move out of limbo. Tax collection rates once bills do get mailed <br />are estimated at .95%. This along with estimated LOIT collections further complicate <br />identifying revenues realistically. All in all budgets presented conservatively estimated <br />are built on an expected decline in revenue of $6 - $8 million from previous pre-HEA <br />1011-08 effects. The Mayor spoke about finer points covered in handout #2 attached. <br />The Mayor emphasized prior to the passage of LOIT the city expected a 27% cut in <br />revenues. City Department Heads were instructed to prepare worst-case scenario <br />budgets. LOIT's passage reduces the expected shortfalls from $12 million to a somewhat <br />more manageable $6 - $8 million less. An overview of how, where, and to what extent <br />managers had to adjust their budgets is detailed in a press release dated 7-28-091isted <br />here as attachment #3. The 3rd attachment also adheres to the priorities the Council <br />related to the Mayor. That is then, a restoration of earlier cuts in police, fire, and park <br />budgets using the funds recently made available by the LOIT passage. <br />