Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING JULY 13, 2009 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />legislation to make private institution pay for services for when dignitaries and other <br />officials come to town and use police, fire and other city services, but it just did not pass. <br /> <br />Councilmember Puzzello asked if a person works in South Bend and lives in Granger <br />would the City of South Bend benefit from this by enacting LOIT. <br /> <br />Mayor Luecke stated that the taxes that are proposed are countywide taxes, so that <br />everyone who lives in St. Joseph County would pay those taxes, it is not paid by where <br />you work but by where you live. So the taxes would be collected on a countywide basis <br />and distributed by formula by the various units of government. He stated that in public <br />safety it is split amongst those units of government that actually have police or fire <br />departments, not every unit of government will receive public safety LOIT distributions. <br />The property tax relief will be distributed county wide and benefit on percentage of tax <br />levy. <br /> <br />Councilmember Varner advised that it is true that the not-for-profit pay good salaries and <br />it is true that many of them work in South Bend, but if in fact that person lives in Granger <br />yes it is collected county wide but the distribution formula from the State back to the <br />County is based on where they live rather than where they work. <br /> <br />Mayor Luecke stated that the distribution is really based upon percentage of levy by each <br />unit of government. South Bend’s levy compared to St. Joseph County levy compared to <br />Mishawaka’s levy is how the full amount is collected county wide ends up being <br />distributed. So it’s really neither by where you live or where you work it’s by percentage <br />of cost of government. <br /> <br />Councilmember Varner asked if there is a net gain to the city? <br /> <br />Mayor Luecke stated that he believes there is. <br /> <br />Councilmember Varner stated that it will be in dollars, but we just don’t know the <br />formula yet. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rouse asked if a person works in St. Joseph County, specifically South <br />Bend, and lives in Elkhart, will they have to pay the tax? <br /> <br />Mayor Luecke stated that they will not pay the tax. On the other hand if they live in St. <br />Joseph County and work in Elkhart, they do pay the tax. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kirsits ask the Mayor to speak to some of the area Counties that have <br />Local Option Income Tax. <br /> <br />Mayor Luecke stated that Elkhart County has 1 ½ % LOIT; they enacted their CAGET <br />when it was first available so they actually had a LOIT twenty (20) years longer than <br />South Bend, providing property tax relief as well as additional dollars for government. <br />He stated that in comparison as a range of income taxes with the state for instance: <br />Pulaski County is the highest local income tax with a rate of 3.13%; Jasper 3.05%; <br />Wabash 2.9%; Morgan 2.72%; Parke 2.55%; Jay 2.45%; Fayette 2.37%; Benton at <br />2.29%; Brown 2.2%; Warren 2.12%; Walls 2.1%; Montgomery 2.1%. He stated that <br />there are a variety of counties that range at between 2% and 1 ½ %. He noted that <br />LaPorte County is at .95%; and Starke County is at 1.06%. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kirsits stated that by no means is St. Joseph County going to be the <br />highest county for a local option income tax. <br /> <br />The Mayor stated that is correct. <br /> <br />Mayor Luecke stated that South Bend has the same property tax caps as every other <br />county in the State, so 1 ½ % for homeowners this year, 1% next year, however, the debt <br />service in the County will be added on top of that for property tax payers. He stated that <br />he does not know exactly what that will be, he stated that he would guess around .1 or .2 <br /> 16 <br /> <br />