Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 9, 2009 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />services due to the increase of residents in the area. The surrounding property values of <br />the existing residential properties to the north may be affected. It is responsible <br />development and growth to allow a mixed use development compatible with surrounding <br />high density residential and commercial uses. Based on information available prior to the <br />public hearing, the staff recommends that the petition be sent to the Common Council <br />with a favorable recommendation. A mixed use development containing both residential <br />and commercial components would not be out of character in this neighborhood. The <br />proximity to the University of Notre Dame, high density residential projects in the area, <br />the commercial at Edison and South Bend Avenue and the new Innovation Park building <br />are driving the need for a walkable, commercial-style development. Ms. Nayder did <br />advised that the Commission received two letters against this rezoning, one from north of <br />Ivy Court and the other from an owner south on Ivy Court who also lives in the <br />neighborhood. <br /> <br />Mr. Michael Danch, President, Danch, Harner & Associates, 1643 Commerce Drive, <br />South Bend, Indiana, representing the petitioners John & Leona Rappelli and Rosemary <br />Mandrici, made the presentation for this bill. <br /> <br />Mr. Danch advised that what they are asking to do is take this property that is on the <br />southeasterly corner of Ivy Court and Twyckenham Drive to a mixed-use category. He <br />stated that they had worked with the University of Notre Dame at the time Twyckenham <br />Drive was realigned and there was some swapping of some property. The petitioners had <br />looked to do something different at this property and would like to do a mixed use. As <br />shown on the site plan is a two story building approximately 9,800 square feet. The first <br />floor would have some small shops. What they are envisioning for this area is something <br />that works well with this area where you have pedestrian traffic, from the University as <br />well as from the condominiums located just east of this development. Also there are <br />small shops along State Rd. 23 and Edison Road, which are similar in nature. The second <br />floor of this development would be residential, approximately 10 units max. Mr. Danch <br />stated that he has been in contact with Mr. James Masters, an attorney who is <br />representing some residents of Jamison House, 1505 Ivy Ct. Some of the concerns have <br />been the access into and out of the development. Mr. Danch stated that there is a paper <br />alley to the east side of the property approximately 14’ foot wide. Just on the other side <br />of that there are condominiums that front toward Notre Dame. Their driveways and <br />garages access a portion of that alley and come out to any alley to the south and goes out <br />to Twyckenham. He stated that he is talking a 14 foot alley that is to the south end of the <br />property and making that to about a 24 foot wide alleyway. He stated that what that will <br />do is allow the condo owners to exit out to Ivy Court better than they can today. The <br />second item of concern for Mr. Master’s clients was to relocate the dumpster unit. He <br />stated that they would move that dumpster and provide heavy screening along the eastern <br />boundary. The final concerning was that no controlled uses or liquor stores as defined in <br />the South Bend Zoning Ordinance would be allowed. <br /> <br />There was no one present wishing to speak in favor of this bill. <br /> <br />The following individual spoke in opposition to the bill. <br /> <br />Mr. James A. Masters, Attorney at Law, 211 W. Washington Street, Suite 1800, South <br />Bend, Indiana, stated that speaking in opposition to this bill is a little harsh. He stated <br />that he is representing seven residents of Jamison House. He stated that his clients <br />concerns are those as mentioned by Mr. Danch. He stated that Mr. Danch’s willingness <br />to modify the site plan to show access easements on the east and south side wide enough <br />to accommodate public safety vehicles; secondly, the relocation of the dumpster so that it <br />does not obstruct the view from the Jamison House; thirdly no controlled uses or liquor <br />stores as defined in the South Bend Zoning Ordinance and lastly not permit game day <br />parking. If those conditions are met, his clients would support this petition. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> 5 <br /> <br />