Laserfiche WebLink
Board of Zoning Appeals -January 18, 2007 <br />MR. FOZO: Yes. <br />rN revna <br />There was no one present to speak in favor of this petition. <br />RCMONSTRANCC <br />These was i~o one present to speak in remonstrance of this petition. <br />~I~srkd i31 tw`~~i d`A~~ ~1~~M~ <br />F E ~ 5 ?_~.~7 <br />JO'r;ld 4ClaCy~ <br />CITY CL~r:~, ~ J, G~,ND, IN. <br />A nlOtlOn t0 SenCl the SpeClal EXCeptl0l]S t0 the Common COllilcil Wlth a Favorable Recommendation was <br />made by Mr. Sassano and seconded by Mr. Hoban. The motion carried unanimously. <br />A motion for approval of the variances was made by Mr. Hoban and seconded by Mr. Kilbase. The motion <br />carried unanimously. <br />After hearing the evidence on the petition, the Board of Zoning Appeals find that you did satisfy the <br />Standards as set forth in LC. 36-7-4-918.5; therefore, the petitions for Special Exception were sent to <br />the Common Council with Favorable Recommendations and the petition for variances granted. <br />Based on the testimony presented, the Board of Zoning Appeals, after carefill colisideration, finds the petition <br />for Special Exceptions sent to the Common Council with Favorable Recommendations and the petition for <br />the variances granted and will issue written Finding of Facts. <br />PETITION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS SENT TO THE COMNION COUNCIL WITH <br />FAVORABLE RECONIMCNDATIONS <br />PETITION FOR VARIANCES GRANTED <br /> <br />