Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING <br />MARCH 24, 2014 <br />Councilmember Ferlic- the Community Investment sends both of these forward with a favorable <br />recommendation. <br />Presenter (Nobel America Ethanol LLC) - We bring before you the resolutions for Nobel <br />America Ethanol LLC for new operators of the ethanol plant here in South Bend. As we <br />discussed earlier to the committee this is a unique resolution for the public hearing today. This is <br />a situation where when we were negotiating for the purpose of purchase ethanol plant to become <br />the new operator the plant was then assessed as personal property for the books of taxation. <br />Upon completing the purchase and acquisition of the plant and after beginning to make <br />improvements to the plant the assessor made the decision to reassess the property as real <br />property. The presence of the building certainly adds a component to this that the local ordinance <br />say you cannot uphold a building permit in order to receive a real property abatement. Members <br />of the corporate and community investment in the council and the crowd that stands before me, <br />we have given them permission to pull the building permit as it was formerly personal property <br />at that time, so while we are asking for building exemptions in the ordinance in real property <br />abatement up to 8 years in addition to that the approval of tax abatement on personal property up <br />to 5 years. Nobel America's has been a good corporate citizen thus far, plans to invest <br />approximately $32 million in the Ethanol plant to bring it back to the state of our facility, <br />secondly to be here for a long, long time. In the event that personal property tax and the real <br />property tax abatements are granted today, we know that the company is doing their due <br />diligence now, economic forecasting to determine which would be of the most value to the <br />company in the long term then the plan is at that time, choose to accept either the real property <br />abatement or appeal to both the assessor and the state assessor to have it reverted back to <br />personal property. In the event that it is kept as personal property abatement full tax abated over <br />a 5 year period would be $102,000 total taxes paid would be $105,000. If it's a real property tax <br />abatement, total taxes abated would be $1,562,000, and total tax paid would be $4, 443,000, total <br />number of jobs created would be 50 with a guarantee rate between $25 to $27 an hour. <br />None for or against: <br />Councilmember Scott- I want to thank you for your investment. One thing Chris, I want to note <br />that we had a meeting done once this gets turned on, we had a sewer issue with the old ethanol <br />plant, not too much of a water issue, but councilman Davis had to deal with a sewer smell <br />happening in the first district and the second district and I want to make sure that we have those <br />meetings and talk about it. I did verse the subject with Dr. Garner, on the utilities committee but <br />I want make sure we are all on the same page moving forward with that. I am supportive, I <br />appreciate the jobs and investment in the city of South Bend. <br />Councilmember Henry Davis- I am supportive of this because of what is going on with it, <br />however I am very unhappy with the process with our tax abatement to saying how it is being <br />utilized maybe there's some miscommunication or misunderstanding on my end. However based <br />upon, me reading what's going on how it's being structured. I'm going to be unclear in and <br />really unhappy, right now I am reluctant to say yes, I want to yes to it, but we really need to <br />change some of the ways that we are defining who gets what, and how to get it and so that it <br />suggests an output for the city and it's just not necessarily a bad driven approach to getting more <br />jobs and expanding our tax abatement because we may be losing out more than we are actually <br />gaining. We may be spending a lot more on getting variables back and that was one of the <br />conversations that we had earlier today but you have my support on this one, sir it is not your <br />fault. This is a part of the things that have taken place for a number of years that I have gotten to <br />the point where I'm looking forward to a sub- committee meeting with in a month so we can have <br />a very nice discussion on how this going to work. <br />Presenter (Nobel America Ethanol LLC) - I'll just say thank you in the whole manner for your <br />investment and thank you to the community investment. I know the assessor's office has <br />originally said this was personal property tax and when you went back to them they said no it <br />looks like it will be real property when they reassessed the property. Thank you to for being <br />flexible in getting this thing moving that's great work. Thank you. <br />Councilmember White- I would like to say this has been a long time coming a long process. I <br />would like to thank councilmember Oliver Davis and others who have worked very hard to <br />23 <br />