Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING JULY 27, 2015 <br />and it's going to end up being generational. I get what you're saying Mr. Ferlic. What I can tell <br />you is that some of my best friends ended up in prison because they refused to go to school, they <br />refused to make the grades because they frowned upon it. If we don't press upon these children, <br />especially the minorities, as this is where it comes from, that they are required to make the grades <br />that or they will have prisons waiting for them or plots out in the field in the local cemetery. That <br />is our reality. If we do nothing than we are failing them, they are not failing us. We are our <br />children's fixture. I digress. <br />There being no one present wishing to speak to the Council in opposition to this bills, <br />Councilmember Mr. Gavin Ferlic made a motion to adopt resolution 15 -74. Councilmember <br />Karen White seconded the motion which carried and the Resolution was adopted by a roll call vote <br />of seven (7) ayes. <br />BILLS - FIRST READING <br />AND REQUESTING A <br />AT 4325 S. MIC <br />COUNCILMANIC DIS <br />INDIANA <br />This bill had first reading. Councilmember <br />Area Plan. Councilmember Mr. Gavin Fer <br />of eight (8) ayes. <br />REPORTS <br />BILL NO. <br />UNIT DJA <br />So moved b <br />motion which <br />Councilmember Ga <br />Committee for August <br />carried by a voice vote <br />ZONING ORDINANCE <br />PROPERTY LOCATED <br />SEND, IN 46614, <br />OF SQUTH BEND, <br />to refer this bill to the <br />carried by a voice vote <br />M R IRMA M11164LrffUwwuN�: <br />nd r ted a motion to accept the substitute bill 29 -15. <br />i Ferlic. Councilmember Oliver Davis seconded the <br />eight (8) ayes. <br />motion to refer bill 29 -15 to Zoning & Annexation <br />iuncilmember Oliver Davis seconded the motion which <br />Councilmember Henry Davis, Jr., when I was looking at the two tax abatements particularly with <br />15 -71, I don't know when or how this will be structured during budget sessions, but I would <br />really like to know where we're making out at; with upping close to a million dollars in city <br />investment and $8 million in private investment. If you are only getting 20 jobs out of $750,000 <br />payroll that equates to roughly $38,000 /yr. and everyone is not going to make the same amount. <br />My thought is how do we spend that type of money and come up with that wage for the year. <br />That is a huge sacrifice on someone's end. I am interested in the jobs that are coming in and <br />how much money each job is going to carry. Are these investments ones that we really need or <br />is it just a means to an end? I'm not really sold that these investments will help turn around our <br />economic situation. This one looked like a sweet -heart deal even with the fact that we have to <br />pay a lease out, if it's not filled in two (2) years; I don't get that. That's neither here nor there, I <br />am in support of it; I voted for it. I have been really critical about our tax abatement policies and <br />how they actually help the city of South Bend. <br />NEW BUSINESS <br />27 <br />