Laserfiche WebLink
COMMUNITY INVESTMENT JULY 28, 2014 4:04 P.M. <br />Committee Members Present: Gavin Ferlic, Henry Davis (AB), Valerie Schey, Derek Dieter <br />Citizen Members Present: Patrick Mullen, Austin Cabello (AB) <br />Other Council Present: Tim Scott, Dr. Fred Ferlic, Dr. David Varner, Oliver Davis, <br />Karen White <br />Others Present: Scott Ford, Brock Zeeb, Marty Wolfson <br />Agenda: 1. Bill 35 -14 Resolution River Race Townhomes <br />2. Update Residential Tax Abatement Proposal <br />Gavin Ferlic, Chair of the Community Investment Committee, noted two items on the agenda. One was <br />bill 35 -14 which would declare a site on the East Bank an economic development target area in an effort <br />to facilitate the development of River Race Townhomes. The other was a resolution to support changes <br />to the tax abatement statute to allow five year abatement for residential rehab of run -down homes. <br />Starting proceedings, Gavin announced he had received a request from the petitioner to withdraw the <br />bill and continue its consideration indefinitely. The request was honored. <br />The second item, a proposal to allow residential rehab abatement was presented by retired Notre Dame <br />Economics professor Marty Wolfson. He said the proposal could provide a stimulus incentive to those <br />wanting to rehab a house as opposed to letting it ultimately be demolished. The abatement would be <br />for 5 years reducing any incremental gain in assessed value due to the rehab by 50% over the abated <br />period. He added there would have to be a minimum of $5,000 invested to a home having an assessed <br />value at or less than median assessed value of houses in the city. His overall message stressed the value <br />of creating an incentive to rehab as opposed to tear -down. <br />Councilmember Valerie Schey expressed concern that the incentive should only apply to owner - <br />occupied homes. Other Councilmembers also wondered about the advisability of creating incentives for <br />land lords who might not exhibit the same concern as a homeowner. <br />Marty Wolfson disagreed, stating the same rehab incentive should be made available to those who <br />provide habitable rental housing. <br />There was some discussion about the value of the incentive considering typical rehab investment likely <br />would not add to the assessed value of a property. <br />Marty said any incentive at all was worth encouraging rehabilitation. <br />