Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 25, 2008 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />In no way shape or form am I against Notre Dame or their expansion but I am definitely <br />PRO-SOUTH BEND! We (South Bend Common Council) need to have a plan in place to <br />make sure the residual dollars flow into South Bend from this tech park, and giving tax <br />abatement does not foster that particular growth. A tax abatement will continue to <br />encourage companies and outsiders not to pay their way unlike the residents that we <br />serve. A good question to ask... Are people from SOUTH BEND, such as skilled laborers <br />and local minority contractors, going to have a hand in working to build this beautiful <br />addition to Notre Dame's campus? Another question to ask... What happens to our <br />downtown growth and downtown businesses? I understand this project will happen in <br />South Bend's city limits but what happens to South Bend's core? This project <br />encompasses Eddy Street Commons and Nano-technology and we as residents of South <br />Bend are hoping that this project works within the next 15 years. Many of us may not be <br />here to see it what happens in 15 years if it ever happens. What is South Bend's plan to <br />increase revenue stream into this city without looking forward to the next great project <br />that comes thru Notre Dame? What is South Bend's next great project and when was the <br />last one? <br /> <br />I hope that we as a council look at these tax abatement thoroughly before we continue to <br />mortgage our children's future away. I hope all goes well with you and look forward to <br />seeing everyone next week. I am so hyped up about the DNC so I can join in on the chant <br />of "YES WE CAN!!!" God Bless! <br /> <br /> <br />There being no one present wishing to speak to the Council either in favor of or in <br />opposition to these Resolutions. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dieter made a motion to adopt Bill No. 08-78. Councilmember <br />LaFountain seconded the motion which carried and the Resolution was adopted by a roll <br />call vote of eight (8) ayes. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dieter made a motion to adopt Bill No. 08-79. Councilmember White <br />seconded the motion which carried and the Resolution was adopted by a roll call vote of <br />eight (8) ayes. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dieter made a motion to adopt Bill No. 08-80. Councilmember Oliver <br />Davis seconded the motion which carried and the Resolution was adopted by a roll call <br />vote of eight (8) ayes. <br /> <br /> <br />BILLS – FIRST READING <br /> <br />BILL NO. 50-08 FIRST READING ON A BILL TO VACATE THE <br /> FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: THE <br /> FIRST NORTH/SOUTH ALLEY WEST OF DR. <br /> MARTIN LUTHER KING BLVD. FROM W. <br /> WASHINGTON STREET NORTH TO THE <br /> FIRST EAST/WEST ALLEY FOR A DISTANCE <br /> OF 198 FEET, MORE OR LESS, AND A WIDTH <br /> OF 8 FEET, MORE OR LESS. BEING A PART <br /> OF DUNBAR’S SUBDIVISION OF BANK <br /> OUTLOTS 31 AND 32, CITY OF SOUTH BEND, <br /> PORTAGE TOWNSHIP, ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, <br /> INDIANA <br /> <br />This bill had first reading. Councilmember Dieter made a motion to refer this bill to the <br />Public Works and Property Vacation Committee and set it for Public Hearing and third <br />Reading on September 8, 2008. Councilmember Oliver Davis seconded the motion <br />which carried by a voice vote of eight (8) ayes. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> 29 <br /> <br />