Laserfiche WebLink
REPORT OF CITY PLANNING COMMISSION <br />The Honorable Common Council <br />City of South Bend <br />South Bend, Indiana <br />Gentlemen: <br />The attached petition of the City Planning commission to rezone from "B" Residential Use and "A " Height and Area <br />District the property generally described as being bounded on the east by Arthur Street, on the west,by Eddy Street, <br />on the North by Sorin Street, and on the south by McKinley Avenue was legally advertised under date of <br />December 30, 1963 and given public hearing on January 9, 1964. The following action was taken: , <br />After due consideration the Commission found that the predominant use in the subject area is single - family <br />residential. It was therefore duly moved, seconded, and unanimously carried that the petition be recommended <br />favorably to the Council with the further recommendation that the petition be amended from the Council floor <br />to exclude Lots 4, 5, 6 of Happ and Taggart Sub. of Lots in Sommer's Addition and Lot 19 of Sommer's Addition. <br />Very truly yours, <br />Is/ Robert L. Huff, Director <br />City Planning Commission <br />Councilman Palmer made a motion that the report be accepted and placed on file. Councilman Muszynski seconded <br />the motion. Motion Carried. <br />REPORT OF CITY PLANNING COMMISSION <br />The Honorable Common Council <br />City of South Bend, <br />South Bend, Indiana <br />Gentlemen: <br />The attached petition of the City Planning Commission to rezone from "B" Residential Use and "A" Height and Area <br />District to "A"" Residential Use and "A" Height and Area District the property generally described as being <br />bounded on the east by Jacob Street, on the west by Eddy Street, on the north by McKinley Avenue, and on the south <br />by Colfax Avenue, LaSalle Avenue and the first east -west alley north of LaSalle Avenue was legally advertised <br />under date of December 30, 1963 and given public hearing on January 9, 1964. The following action was taken; <br />After due consideration the Commission found that the predominant use in the subject area is single family <br />residential. It was therefore duly moved, seconded and unanimously carried that the petition be recommended <br />favorably to the Council with the further recommendation that the petition be amended from the Council floor <br />to exclude Lots 1 -11 of Bullard's 1st Addition, a 50 foot by 120 foot lot on the northeast corner of Fish <br />Tract, being the southeast corner of McKinley Avenue and Eddy Street and also a 50 foot by 120 3/8 foot lot <br />northeast of the northwest one quarter of Fisher's Tract. <br />Very truly yours, <br />Is/ Robert L. Huff, Director <br />City Planning Commission <br />Councilman Geib made a motion that the report be accepted and placed on file. Councilman Szymkowiak seconded the <br />motion. Motion carried. <br />REPORT OF CITY PLANNING COMMISSION <br />The Honorable Common Council <br />City of South Bend <br />South Bend, Indiana <br />Gentlemen: <br />January 9, 1964 <br />The attached petition of Annette and Eugene White, et al, to rezone from " "B "" Ree idential Use and "Ai' Height and <br />Area District to "C "Commercial Use and " "E"" Height and Area District Lots 94, 95 and 96 of Plat of Fordham, being <br />more generally described as being bounded on the north by Mishawaka Avenue, on the east by 33rd Street, on the south <br />by the first east -west alley south of Mishawaka Avenue and on the west by the first north -south alley west of 33rd <br />street was legally advertised under date of November 30, 1963 and given public hearing on December 10, 1963. The <br />following action was taken: <br />After due consideration the Commission found that the proposed zoning is a logical extension <br />of existing commercial zoning and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning <br />Ordinance and Future Land Use Plan. It was therefore duly moved, seconded, and unanimously <br />carried that the petition be recommended favorably to the council. <br />Very truly yours, <br />s /Robert L. Huff, <br />Director of Planning <br />Councilman Glass made a motion that the report be accepted and placed on file. Councilman Muszynski seconded <br />the motion. Motion carried. <br />ORDINANCE - FIRST AND SECOND HEARING <br />AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING AN ORDERLY PROCEDURE BY WHICH <br />EMPLOYEES MAY HEARD CONCERNING BUDGET ITEMS WHICH AFFECT THEIR SALARIES <br />AND WAGES AND BY WHICH EMPLOYEES MAY PRESENT GRIEVANCES WHICH RESULT FROM <br />DIFFERENCES OF OPINION BETWEEN SUPERVISORS AND EMPLOYEES UPON WORKING <br />CONDITIONS, INCLUDING ARBITRATION PROCEDURES AND PROVISIONS FOR DEDUCTING <br />FROM EMPLOYEES' WAGES FUNDS TO PAY ORGANIZATIONS OF EMPLOYEES, AS AMENDED, <br />KNOWN AS ORDINANCE.4612 -63 ENACTED, ON THE 13th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1963. <br />The ordinance was given first reading by title and second reading in full. Councilman Geib made a motion for <br />suspension of rules. Councilman Palmer seconded the motion. Motion lost by a roll call vote of 8 ayes - 1 nay <br />(Muszynski). The ordinance was then set for public hearing on January 27th, 1964. <br />