Laserfiche WebLink
SPECIAL MEETING <br />COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING (Cont.) <br />Budget for the Sanitation Department- (Cont.) <br />AUGUST 30, 1971 <br />duction, however, in the presentation to the Council it was indicated that the cost of the <br />garbage collection is $9.00 per unit per year; the present collection is being made from 15,000 <br />of a possible 40,000 units. We know this is inefficient, therefore it is the recommendation of <br />the Administration that the garbage collection be eliminated and proposed that the trash haulers <br />pick up garbage as well as trash from the residents. Mr. Taylor then recommended reductions in <br />personnel and moneys. Mr. Peter J. Nemeth, Jr., a South Bend Attorney representing the Inde- <br />pendent Trash Haulers Association, conveyed the thanks of the Association for the action taken <br />by the Council but stated that he was surprised by the announcement of the Administration as <br />neither he nor the Association had received word of the proposed plan of the City. He said it <br />was the purpose of the trash haulers not to fight with the City but to cooperate in this matter <br />and it was correct that the independent trash haulers could pick up garbage as well as trash; <br />adequate service can be given and there would be no trash emergency. Councilman Laven asked <br />if the remaining four units of the City's Sanitation Department would pick up trash and garbage <br />on a regular basis or by an on -call basis. Mr. Taylor replied it would be by on -call basis and <br />the City's trash ordinance would also need to be changed. Councilman Laven recalled that the <br />concept of this matter had been discussed. Councilman Reinke felt that the independent haulers <br />could pick up everything, the trash and garbage hauling had been extensively discussed and the <br />present program has not been re- evaluated; the problem cannot be solved with giving service to <br />just several streets on specified days of the week. He said much consideration should be given <br />to this problem. Councilman Janet Allen said that the Council never discussed cutting down and <br />laying off any personnel and it certainly would not be an efficient program if it did not pro- <br />perly operate; she opposed servicing of the down -town area solely. <br />Councilman Janet Allen made a motion for a ten minute recess, seconded by Councilman Szymkowiak. <br />Motion carried. Time 10:42 P.M. <br />COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING - RECONVENED <br />Be it remembered that the Committee of the Whole of the Common Council of South Bend, Indiana <br />reconvened in the Council Chambers of the County -City Building on Monday, August 30, 1971 at <br />11:00 P.M. after a short recess. The meeting was called to order by Chairman William Grounds <br />who presided. <br />Budget for the Motor Vehicle Highway Department: <br />Councilman Laven moved that there be no discussion on the M.V.H. budget, seconded by Councilman <br />Zielinski. Motion carried. <br />Budget for the Park Department: <br />SERVICES PERSONAL <br />Labor, Care & Upkeep of Buildings, Grounds, <br />Equipment, Forestry, Etc. <br />13 Extra and Overtime <br />SERVICES CONTRACTUAL <br />PROPOSED RECOMMENDED APPROVED <br />FOR 1972 REDUCTIONS FOR 1972 <br />$739,103 $ 20,000 $719,103 <br />100,000 10,000 90,000 <br />224 <br />Water and Sewage <br />9,300 <br />1,800 <br />7,500 <br />261 <br />Other Contractual Services, General <br />40,000 <br />20,000 <br />20,000 <br />262 <br />Band Concerts, Dance Bands, & P.A. System <br />8,135 <br />715 <br />7,420 <br />263 <br />Physicians and Hospitals <br />1,000 <br />1,000 <br />0 <br />264 <br />Paving <br />8,000 <br />4,000 <br />4,000 <br />CURRENT OBLIGATIONS <br />63 <br />Retirement <br />111,000 <br />3,798 <br />107,202 <br />PROPERTIES <br />712 Other Structures <br />722 Motor Equipment <br />726 Other Equipment <br />31,500 25,000 6,500 <br />56,800 1,800 55,000 <br />28,615 2,615 26,000 <br />Councilman Reinke read the recommendations of the Council for reductions in this budget. Mr. <br />James Seitz of the Park Department commented on the $25,000 reduction in Account 712 Other <br />Structures stating this was originally intended for the restoration of Potawatomi Zoo. He said <br />they were hopeful of making definite improvements in the present zoo; there is great public <br />reaction and complaints on not taking care of the zoo properly. He mentioned there were new <br />Federal requirements for inspection and he said he was fearful that the zoo cannot pass the <br />standards. He stated the zoo should be a pride for South Bend as there are 250,000 visitors <br />each year, including children, senior citizens, and people of all ages; and asked that the <br />Council reconsider this cut. Councilman Janet Allen asked from what account the animals were <br />purchased and Mr. Seitz named Account 726 Other Equipment. Councilman Laven asked if there <br />could be a bond issue or a legislative change in this regard and Miss Guthrie asked if the City <br />could accommodate such funding. Mrs. Wlodarski said the Fair Tax Association felt several posi- <br />tions in Account 11 Services Personal could be eliminated, specifically supervisors; they felt <br />reductions could be made from the present four Foremen III and the Custodian at Pinhook Park. <br />Further they recommended reductions in Account 13 Extra and Overtime and Account 214 Telephone <br />