Laserfiche WebLink
SPECIAL MEETING <br />COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING (Cont.) <br />Budget for the Department of Weights and Measures: <br />AUGUST 30, '1971 <br />Councilman Reinke stated that no reductions were recommended by the Council for this department. <br />Mrs. Faith Martin questioned why there were two inspectors for the City and only one for the <br />County. Councilman Craven said that the City inspectors had more calls to make. <br />Budget for the Studebaker Historical Collection: <br />PROPOSED RECOMMENDED APPROVED <br />PROPERTIES FOR 1972 REDUCTIONS FOR 1972 <br />S -722 Motor Equipment $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 0 <br />Councilman Reinke stated this budget was given long and serious consideration and it was propose <br />to reduct Account S -722 Motor Equipment by $2,000. Mrs. Wlodarski said that the Fair Tax <br />Association recommended elimination of this collection until a proper receptacle can be found <br />for adequate housing of the collection. <br />Budget for the Traffic Department: <br />SERVICES PERSONAL <br />T -12 Signal Technician I <br />T -13 Extra and Overtime <br />PROPOSED <br />FOR 1972 <br />$ <br />23,275 <br />25,000 <br />RECOMMENDED <br />REDUCTIONS <br />$ 7,758 <br />5,000 <br />APPROVED <br />FOR 1972 <br />$ 15,517 <br />20,000 <br />Councilman Reinke stated the Council had the following recommendations for reduction of this <br />budget: Account T -12, Signal Technician - reduce from 3 to 2 at a saving of $7;758 and <br />Account T -13 Extra and Overtime be reduced by $2,500. Miss Guthrie stated that the Civic Plan- <br />ing Association recommended that Extra and Overtime be reduced by $5,000. Mrs. Mutzl stated <br />that the Fair Tax Association recommendations also were for added reductions in Extra and Over- <br />time. Councilman Craven addressed Miss Guthrie and said that more of this budget could be cut <br />if the Federal Program money could be used, but Federal funds could not be used as this is a <br />newly created job. <br />Budget for Municipal Services Facility: <br />SERVICES PERSONAL <br />U -12 Preventive Maintenance Man <br />SERVICES CONTRACTUAL <br />U -252 Repairs of Equipment <br />U -261 Janitor <br />SUPPLIES <br />U -37 Other Supplies <br />PROPOSED RECOMMENDED APPROVED <br />FOR 1972 REUDCTIONS FOR 1972 <br />$ 52,748 <br />38,170 <br />25,000 <br />2,500 <br />$ 26,374 <br />3,170 <br />3,000 <br />1,000 <br />$ 26,374 <br />35,000 <br />22,000 <br />1,500 <br />Councilman Reinke reported that the greatest reduction recommended by the Council for this <br />budget resulted from the following: Account U -12 Preventive Maintenance Man - reduce from 8 <br />to 4 at a saving of $26,374. Miss Guthrie stated that controls should be provided for Account <br />U -13 Extra and Overtime and also for U -261 Janitor Services to be reduced. Mr. Lloyd S. Taylor, <br />City Engineer, read the following letter: <br />I <br />August 30, 1971" <br />Memo to: Members of the Common Council <br />Subject: Budget Items for 1972 - M.S.F. <br />We have been advised that the Council is considering the reduction of budget <br />item U -252 (Repairs of Equipment) and U -43 (Repair Parts) in the Municipal <br />Services Facility budget. <br />As you are quite aware, funds in these M.S.F. accounts <br />formed for other units of city government. We attempt <br />best of our ability the services and repairs that will <br />pieces of city -owned equipment. We naturally use past <br />anticipated price increases to come up with a figure B <br />extend 18 months into the future. <br />cover services per - <br />to estimate to the <br />be needed on over 300 <br />history as well as <br />Dr a budget that will <br />Below I have listed for these two items the expenditures in 1970, total <br />Council approved appropriations in 1971, and our requested 1972 budget. <br />