Laserfiche WebLink
22 <br />COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING AUGUST 25, 1969 <br />(Letter from South Bend Civic Planning Association continued) <br />We request that the Street Department budget be eliminated from the property tax and same be paid <br />entirely from MVH funds, the same as the county, This is particularly true now that the <br />$80,000.00 from parking meter funds has been eliminated from income. <br />We recommend that the Fire Department Buildings and Fixed Equipment item of $160,000.00 and Land <br />$6,000.00 be paid out of Cumulative Capital Improvement Fund. Also that, if possible, the <br />aerial truck $54,000.00 be paid from this fund. <br />We recommend that the Park Department Buildings and Fixed Equipment item of $51,500.00 and Land <br />$50,000.00 also be taken from the Cumulative Capital Improvement Fund which shows $709,181.00 for <br />1970 and is more than sufficient to cover these two departments. <br />In summary: Fire Department Buildings and Fixed Equipment $160,000.00 <br />Land 6,000.00 <br />Truck 54,000.00 <br />Street Department, paid from MVH Fund 64,390.00 <br />Total General Fund Reduction $284,390.00 or 11.7 <br />Park Department Buildings and Land 101,500.00 or 4.4(� <br />Total rate reduction 16.1 <br />We suggest that you look into setting up an orientation on Value Analysis Techniques of reducing <br />costs which would be offered by personnel at Ivy Tech at no charge. This could be worked out <br />with some of the departments as a pilot program. <br />We seriously question that the city should go into an employees retirement program at a cost of <br />$332,000.00 with so little information available. <br />We will have questions and recommendations on other items at the meeting Monday. <br />Respectfully, <br />/s/ Virginia Guthrie <br />Executive Secretary <br />The following letter was submitted by the South Bend Blue Chip Chapter of the JayCees, and read <br />by Mr. David Hall: <br />August 22, 1969 <br />Mr. Robert O. Laven <br />President <br />Common Council <br />City of South Bend, Indiana <br />Dear Mr. Laven: <br />Re: 1970 Budget for City <br />of South Bend, Indiana <br />The entire membership of the South Bend Jaycees, Inc., has, during past months, given <br />considerable time to a study of the proposed budget for the civil City of South Bend for 1970. <br />We have met with interested taxpayer groups, including South Bend Civic Planning Association, <br />Inc. and as you know, recently met informally with members of the South Bend Common Council. <br />Generally speaking, we have concluded that the proposed increases set forth in the 1970 proposed <br />budget are, in some instances, excessive and should be decreased before the budget is finally <br />approved. <br />Our position is not, however, that any increase in taxes is improper, as we feel that the <br />expenses of operating a civil city are increasing and the growth of our community depends in <br />part upon increased services by the city to taxpayer residents. We feel, however, that certain <br />items may be allocated or reduced to effect a slightly lower tax rate without hampering the <br />growth of our community and the services provided to taxpayers. <br />The South Bend Jaycees suggest that you give consideration to the following changes in the <br />proposed 1970 budget: <br />1. Office of the Controller. Account B -62 should be reduced by eliminating therefrom the <br />proposed retirement plan. A study should be made in depth to determine the most feasible way <br />of achieving a retirement plan for city employees before funds are raised for any particular <br />plan. <br />2. City Clerk. Account C -52. It is suggested that instead of each city office renting a <br />Xerox machine, several offices use one machine put in a central location. This will save a good <br />deal of expense to the taxpayers. <br />3. Board of Public Works and Safety. Account H -252. It was our understanding that the <br />repairs and maintenance of the Studebaker Antique Car Collection would be funded from private <br />sources and not paid by taxpayers. This item should be investigated before any allocation is <br />made. <br />H -72. This particular account is not explained to our satisfaction. A complete explana- <br />tion must be made as to the contents of this item before funds are allocated. <br />