Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING JUNE 24 1974 <br />IIREGULAR MEETING - RECONVENED (CONTINUED) <br />11RESOLUTION NO. 430 -74 (CONTINUED) <br />WHEREAS, the Board of Park Commissioners of the Park District of the City of <br />South Bend has determined to take the necessary steps for the construction of a White <br />Water Way Park, Island Park Development, Pier Park Development and Centennial Park <br />Development and for the acquisition of approximately eight (8) acres of land adjacent <br />to the White Water Way Park; and for the complete renovation of Potawatomi Park Zoo, <br />a public park within the City of South Bend, Indiana; and <br />WHEREAS, a petition has been filed under the provisions of Chapter 119 of the <br />Indiana Acts of 1937 by more than fifty (50) owners of taxable real estate of the City <br />of South Bend, Indiana, requesting said Board of Park Commissioners of the Park District <br />of the City of South Bend to issue park district bonds for the purpose of providing funds <br />to be applied on the construction of a White Water Way Park, Island Park Development, <br />Pier Park Development and Centennial Park Development and for the acquisition of approxi- <br />mately eight (8) acres of land adjacent to the White Water Way Park; and for the complete <br />renovation of Potawatomi Park Zoo, a public park within the City of South Bend, Indiana, <br />and on the payment of the incidental expenses in connection therewith and on account of <br />the issuance of bonds therefor; and <br />WHEREAS, the Common Council finds that the construction of such park and park <br />development, the acquisition of approximately eight (8) acres of land and the complete <br />renovation of Potawatomi Park Zoo by the Board of Park Commissioners of the City of <br />South Bend, Indiana, is in the best interest of and will be for the general benefit of <br />the City and its citizens; and <br />WHEREAS, said Common Council agrees that such project must be funded by the <br />issuance of park district bonds; and <br />WHEREAS, it is necessary for there to be an appropriation in an amount not to <br />exceed One Million Seven Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,700,000.00), in order that the <br />above projects proceed. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of South Bend, <br />Indiana: <br />That the proposed issuance of park district bonds by the Board of Park Commissioners <br />of the Park District of the City of South Bend, Indiana, in an amount not to exceed One <br />Million Seven Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,700,000.00), the purpose of which is to pro- <br />vide funds to be applied on the construction of a White Water Way Park, Island Park <br />Development, Pier Park Development and Centennial Park Development and for the acquisi- <br />tion of approximately eight (8) acres of land adjacent to the White Water Way Park; and <br />for the complete renovation of Potawatomi Park Zoo, a public park within the City of <br />South Bend, Indiana, is hereby approved. <br />s/ Roger 0. Parent <br />Member of the Common Council <br />A public hearing was held on the resolution at this time. Mr. James Seitz, Director of the <br />Department of Public Parks, explained that the Board of Park Commissioners was requesting the <br />Council to approve the resolution authorizing the Park Board to proceed with the legal requirement <br />for the issuance of $1.7 million dollars of Park District Bonds. He stated that the proposed bond <br />issue would be for $700,000 for the first phase of the master plan for the renovation of the zoo; <br />$286,000 for the acquisition of three parcels of land adjacent to the Civic Center; $230,000 for <br />the development of Island Park; $39,000 for the development of Centennial Park; $140,000 for the <br />development of Pier Park; $250,000 for the development of the White Water Way; $19,000 for <br />architects' fees; $14,000 for attorney's fees and bond cost and $22,000 for contingencies. Mr. <br />Seitz indicated that, if revenue sharing funds or other funds would be available, the White Water <br />Way development would not be included in the proposed bond issue and that money then would be <br />designated for the zoo renovation. He stated that the Park Board could eliminate any of the pro- <br />jects within the bond issue but could not change them. <br />Councilman Kopczynski wondered if the resolution contained any funds for development of the <br />Belleville Gardens Park, and Mr. Seitz indicated that it did not. Councilman Miller asked who <br />would issue the bonds, and Mr. Seitz indicated that this hearing was to be the last hearing on the <br />bond issue and the Park Board would then negotiate and sign the bonds. He stated that the $1.7 <br />million dollar figure could not be increased. Councilman Miller wondered if some of the areas <br />within the bond could be changed, and Mr. Seitz explained that certain items can be taken out but <br />there could be no changes. Councilman Miller stated that he was concerned about the issuance of t <br />bonds for the Civic Center project. Mr. Seitz indicated that the Park Board had approved the <br />financing and would eventually hold about three public hearings on the necessary resolutions. <br />In January or February, it was hoped the bonds could be sold. Mr. Seitz indicated that the first <br />hearing would be in July. Councilman Miller made a motion to table the resolution and place it on <br />the agenda for the July 8th Council meeting, seconded by Councilman Kopczynski. Council President <br />Nemeth asked about the timetable on the development of Belleville Gardens. Mr. Seitz indicated <br />that the ball diamond was being constructed. Councilman Kopczynski asked if the improvements to b <br />made at Belleville Gardens would only be handled through the Park Department budget, and Mr. Seitz <br />indicated that they would. Councilman Serge could see no reason to table the issue. Councilman <br />Miller explained that he was somewhat confused on what the bond issue covered. He wanted some tim <br />to evaluate the plans for the land acjacent to the Civic Center. Mr. Seitz explained that the <br />resolution was proposed in the broadest scope possible. He urged the Council to pass the resoluti <br />He stated that any of the items could be deleted, if desired. The motion to table the resolution <br />lost. <br />Councilman Newburn made a motion that,the resolution be adopted, seconded by Councilman Serge. Tr <br />resolution passed by a roll call vote of eight ayes (Councilmen Serge, Szymkowiak, Miller, Taylor, <br />Kopczynski, Horvath, Newburn and Nemeth) with Councilman Parent absent. <br />