Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 24, 1973 <br />COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING (CONTINUED) <br />much larger than it was in 1960. He talked briefly about the payment of the bonds and indicated <br />that an annual average of $240,000 would be needed for the next seven years. He stated that the <br />outside meter program should be continued and not discontinued because of lack of funds. He <br />indicated that the cost of that program would cost about $275,000 annually for the next five years <br />He briefly talked about the investment in larger watermains because of the general growth of the <br />system. He stated that the city's next immediate involvement was with the Maple Lane and Gilmer <br />Park areas, with the average annual cost for the next five years for the projects at $150,000. He <br />also mentioned the problem of the rusty water in South Bend, and indicated that money must be spen <br />for improvement of the water continually. Mr. Krueper concluded by indicating that, if the Counci <br />did not approve the 50 %'increase, one or more of the proposed programs of the Waterworks System <br />would have to be reduced or omitted. <br />Mr. Maurice Cohen, 725 East Eckman Street, indicated that he had not even seen a financial state- <br />ment from the Waterworks System, and he wondered if the Council had been furnished a copy. He <br />asked about the payroll costs and stated that these figures were not even available. He did not <br />understand the necessity of the increase. He commented on the city -owned car situation within the <br />Waterworks Department and concluded by indicating that he thought honesty was lost in the adminis- <br />tration. Mrs. Casimer Deka, 1121 Harvey Street, questioned the minimum increase of the water per <br />month. Mr. Krueper indicated that a person paying $1.10 per month would pay $1.65 per month if th4 <br />rate increase was approved. He explained that, on a two -month basis, the amount would go from <br />$2.20 to $3.30. Mrs. Deka wondered how this increase would affect the sewage charge. Mr. Krueper <br />indicated that the sewage was based upon the consumption of the water but would not increase. Mrs <br />Deka indicated that she had appeared before the Council in the spring because she had a complaint <br />on the rusty water in her home. She indicated that Mr. Krueper had been very kind to her and was <br />attempting to solve her problem, but she stated that it still was a problem and no solution had <br />been found to correct it. She stated that now, part of the increase in the water rate would go <br />for the installation of watermains in newly annexed areas and she wondered when she would have <br />clean water. Mr. Milton Katz, 1845 Churchill Drive, stated that the proposed increase was quite <br />sizable for those persons with business and commercial enterprises. He felt consideration should <br />be given to those persons. Mrs. Zoie Smith, 1133 North Twyckenham, President of the Northeast <br />Senior Citizens Council, indicated that the older persons in the community could not afford to pay <br />that high an increase in the water rate. She indicated that the 50% added up, especially with all <br />the other increases the citizens were faced with. She stated that some of the people in her area <br />live on social security alone and would not be able to afford the increase. She asked for some <br />consideration for the elderly in the ordinance and stated that the senior citizens were responsible <br />for the prosperity the city was presently enjoying. She concluded by indicating that water was <br />very vital to every citizen and some people could not even afford to pay for it. Mr. Joseph <br />Guentert, 1034 Foster Street, indicated that he had attended the public hearing held on the Clay <br />Township annexation. At that time, it had been stated that the proposed annexation would pose no <br />increase in costs to the City of South Bend. He stated that now, a 50% increase was being request, <br />to help cover the cost of water to the newly annexed areas. He felt strongly that the water rate <br />had an affect on the sewage rate, and he talked briefly on the use of phosphates in the water and <br />stated that it seemed to him that the citizens were dumping better water into the river than the <br />water bring brought into the homes. Mrs. Richard Minton, 753 Cottage Grove Avenue, also could not <br />understand how Mr. Krueper could state that the water rate did not affect the sewage rate. She <br />opposed the rate increase and indicated that many people could not afford to pay the 50% increase. <br />She stated that she was tired of all the increases in everything. Mrs. Conchita Washington, 749 <br />South Sheridan Street, indicated that she desired to speak as a citizen and as a representative of <br />the South Bend Branch of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. She felt <br />the rate increase was an unnecessary burden upon the taxpayers. She mentioned revenue sharing <br />funds and other funds that were available to the city. She wondered what the citizens would be <br />getting in return for the 50% increase. She stated that South Bend has the poorest water in the <br />area and yet the water rate is higher than the rates in cities three times the size of South Bend. <br />She wondered if the increase was being asked for only because everything else was being increased. <br />She talked briefly about the people living on welfare. She indicated that the majority of the <br />people in the Model Cities area were black and elderly. She stated that they could not afford thi <br />high an increase because their incomes were not being increased. She asked the Council to re- <br />consider the proposed increase and not approve it. Mrs. Ann Wlodarski, 1869 Riverside Drive, a <br />representative of the St. Joseph County Fair Tax Association, indicated that Mr. Krueper had state <br />that there had been no increase in the water rate since 1960. She felt that, obviously, the <br />Waterworks System was making a profit. She did not feel comparisons of other cities and their <br />water rates should be made. She asked when the practice had been started that members of the Boar <br />of Public Works were compensated for acting on the Board of Waterworks. She questioned the <br />Controller's salary. Mr. James Barcome, City Controller, indicated that he wanted to clarify that <br />statement. He stated that he received $2,000 from acting as a member of the Board of Waterworks <br />Commissioners and his salary was taken from the General Fund. Mrs. Wlodarski requested that those <br />amounts be terminated for the members of the Waterworks Commission. She asked if the Council had <br />ever received an itemized budget from the Waterworks. Chairman Newburn indicated that the Council <br />had received a financial statement. Mrs. Wlodarski stated that the waterworks was a public utilit <br />and she felt the utility should be responsible to the citizens and not the Mayor. She cited <br />instances when money was spent in the past and wasted in the Waterworks System. She felt that the <br />water rate and sewage rate were correlated. She brought up the matter of the River Commons area <br />which was county and not city, and she indicated that the residents of that area were being served <br />by the city as far as sewage was concerned and were not paying for it. She wondered about this. <br />Mr. Krueper stated that he had just found out about that matter a month ago when driving around <br />in the area. He assured Mrs. Wlodarski that the residents of the River Commons area would be back <br />billed for sewage charges and if these charges were not paid, the service would be shut down. Mr.' <br />James Roemer, City Attorney, indicated that he also wanted to clarify the situation regarding pay - <br />ment to the members of the Waterworks Board. He stated that he received $1,000 from the Waterwork <br />and $1,000 from Wastewater for a total salary of $13,850. He felt that the money he received from <br />the Waterworks and Wastewater was justified. He stated that his time was allocated for those two <br />divisions. He also felt Mr. Barcome and Mr. Farrand earned the money they received as a member of <br />the board. Mr. Roman Kowalski, 802 Birchwood, stated that he felt the wages of the citizens <br />should be increased accordingly if the water rate was going to be increased 50 %. He asked if some <br />help could be obtained from the federal government for the senior citizens, and he stated that he <br />felt some of the revenue sharing funds should be used in this instance. Miss Virginia Guthrie, <br />Executive Secretary of the Civic Planning Association, indicated that the association had requeste <br />that the Council postpone action on the water rate increase for two weeks in order that the proper <br />figures could be made available for further study in the matter. She questioned whether or not it <br />would be proper to use the monies paid by the present waterworks users to operate the facility <br />outside the city. Mr. Krueper indicated that, any time service is expanded, the developer is <br />