Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING JULY 23 1973 <br />COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING (CONTINUED) <br />May 22, 1973, an article appeared regarding President Nixon's Phase III economic controls and it <br />stated that the cost of living had increased at an annual rate of 9.2 %. On June 7, 1973, the <br />wholesale price index took a jump of 2.1% over April. On June 21, 1973, the rise in the cost of <br />living in May worked out to an annual rate of 7.2 %, and in July, an article appeared regarding the <br />increase in farm products. Mr. Lawrence indicated that he was aware of the fiscal problems of the <br />Council and the city, he realized the option tax was not adopted by the County Council and he also <br />realized the needs of the city were enormous; however, he indicated that other Indiana cities were <br />able to provide a more realistic wage increase. He indicated that the following cities were con- <br />sidering the following increases: <br />Richmond .. ............................... 6% <br />Mishawaka ................................ 5% and up <br />St. Joseph County Highway Department ..... 5% <br />St. Joseph County Park Department ........52% and up <br />Fort Wayne ... ............................15� per hour <br />Terre Haute .. ............................12� to 15� per hour <br />Michigan City ............................ 7% <br />Evansville ... ............................52% and up <br />He wondered why South Bend could not do the same. He quoted a portion of Mayor Miller's 1972 <br />annual report referring to the establishment of the Department of Human Resources and Economic <br />Development. He felt that the administration and the Council had failed in its responsibility to <br />the 1,475 city employees. He stated that the only real tool the workers possess is the right to <br />strike and that had been denied them. He referred to portions of a report entitled "Collective <br />Bargaining in American Government" which referred to the establishment of a special board to work <br />at such a time as was present. He concluded by indicating that the union would like that fact - <br />finding concept considered by the Council at some later date. Mr. Maurice Cohen, 725 East Eckman, <br />talked briefly about the Street Department employees. He felt the city was not allocating funds <br />properly, and he referred to the increase in the Mayor's secretary's salary and the cabinet <br />officials' increases. He felt nepotism, favortism and patronage should not be taken into consider <br />tion. Mrs. Irene Gammon, City Clerk, explained her reasons for the increases proposed for the <br />positions of Chief Deputy and Deputy. She indicated that, at the time the budgets were submitted, <br />the department heads were asked to leave the salaries blank. She indicated that she had tried to <br />receive some guidance regarding the salary increases but had not received any. She stated that, <br />at this time, she would not want her employees to receive a greater increase than was being given <br />to other city employees and she hoped the Council would reduce the salaries of her workers in line <br />with other employees. Chairman Newburn referred to the remark made by the Mayor regarding the <br />absence of the councilmen at the salary caucus meeting by stating that he would have attended the <br />meeting; however, he had been involved with contract negotiations at AM General Corporation. Miss <br />Virginia Guthrie, Executive Secretary of the Civic Planning Association, indicated that when pri- <br />vate business must cut back, the rest of the people must work more. She mentioned that it was <br />difficult to tell exactly what the total increase in the budget would be. She wondered how many <br />people were employed in the various positions and talked about reduction of employees. She <br />indicated that, as of May 1, 1974, the County Council would again consider the option tax and, at <br />that time, it might become effective. She stated that many people in the community were not even <br />getting a cost of living increase. Mrs. Lee Swan, 2022 Swygart, referred to the increase proposed <br />for the Mayor's secretary and some cabinet members. She indicated that the Mayor's secretary has <br />a secretary, to which much of the work is "shuffled ", along with a great deal -of work being <br />referred to the Mayor's Action Line. She indicated that it is not easy to obtain the right infor- <br />mation from that center. She indicated that, in increasing some of the salaries of the cabinet <br />officials, considering the fringe benefits, it amounts to $20,000. Mr. John Braboy, Chief Steward <br />in the Street Department, indicated that $200 was not a sufficient increase. He indicated that, <br />after deductions, a person could not even live on that. He indicated that he takes home only $195 <br />every two weeks, and he concluded by indicating that he was working for nothing. Mr. Lucian <br />Szymanski, 810 South Lake Street, quoted a statement from the St. Joseph County Wage and Salary <br />Committee regarding the proposed city salary increases. Mr. Larry Cook, 1510 Johnson Street, <br />indicated that about 90% of the firemen in the union voted for a strike, and he mentioned that the E <br />men mean what they say. He stated that they could not live on what they are taking home. He con- <br />cluded by stating that the firemen get paid for what they know, not who they know. Mr. Maurice <br />Cohen, 725 East Eckman, referred to the position of Legislative Assistant to the Council for $15,0 <br />He indicated that state senators and representatives were in South Bend, and he questioned why this <br />position was needed when the policemen and firemen could not even get a decent raise. He question c <br />the position of dog catcher and indicated that the animal problem should be handled by the Humane <br />Society because it is receiving funds from the city. He indicated that he appreciated the fact <br />that Mrs. Gammon had decreased the salaries of her employees from the proposed amount. He also <br />mentioned that he wondered if the citizens were aware that the City Controller received a salary o <br />$15,000 and also received $2,000 from being a member of the Water Works Commission. He also state <br />that cars are furnished to the cabinet members in many cases. He questioned the payroll of the <br />Water Department. Mrs. Janet Allen, 125 West Marion Street, also questioned the position of dog <br />catcher and indicated that the Humane Society was taking care of the problem and it was covered <br />through the Model Cities programs in that area. She concluded by indicating that the only <br />equitable thing to do was to give all employees a $200 increase. Mayor Miller indicated that the <br />Water Department budget was presented and would be again. He mentioned that there was a decrease <br />in payroll in that department. A gentleman employed by the Street Department indicated that the <br />city could not.survive without that department, and he felt it was just as important to South Bend <br />as its police and fire protection. <br />Council President Nemeth made a motion to amend the ordinance by deleting the position of General <br />Foreman at the Municipal Services Facility and inserting the position of Maintenance Supervisor at <br />a rate of $12,000, seconded by Councilman Kopczynski. The motion carried. Council President Neme i <br />then made a motion to amend the ordinance further as follows: <br />Chief Deputy City Attorney ........ <br />Director, Human Resources ................. <br />Superintendent of Parks ................... <br />Recreation Planner ........................ <br />Senior Citizens Director .................. <br />Director, Public Safety ................... <br />Secretary I ......... <br />Accounting Clerk I ........................ <br />Stenographer I ............................ <br />$ 7,571 <br />16,200 <br />15,950 <br />12,000 <br />5,015 <br />15,200 <br />4,500 Minimum <br />5,000 Minimum <br />4,500 Minimum <br />