Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING MAY 14, 1973 <br />COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING (CONTINUED) <br />that this would only be a start, and that the building would be metal and was under design at the <br />present time. He indicated that the initial plans called for "off- season" storage in that in the <br />winter months, summer equipment would be parked in the building. He indicated that the 6,000 squa <br />foot building would not fulfill the requirements of putting all the equipment under storage; how- <br />ever, the parking and fencing arrangements were being revised in the hopes that some day a complet <br />security system would be utilized. <br />Mrs. Janet Allen, 125 West Marion Street, asked if the building would be heated, and Mr. Richardso <br />indicated that the only utility would be electricity for lighting; however, the building would be <br />insulated. Councilman Kopczynski indicated that he felt this building was a very good idea becaus <br />it would be something that would be with the city for a great many years and would provide better <br />services for the taxes that the citizens pay. Chairman Newburn asked if the building would confor <br />to the Building Code, and Mr. Richardson assured him that it would. <br />Councilman Serge made a motion that the ordinance go to the Council as favorable, seconded by <br />Councilman Kopczynski. The motion carried. <br />ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE TRANSFERRING THE SUM OF $45,000.00 <br />BETWEEN VARIOUS ACCOUNTS IN THE FEDERAL ASSIS- <br />TANCE PROGRAM FA -10, "BUREAU OF SOLID WASTE ", <br />ALL ACCOUNTS BEING WITHIN THE BUREAU OF SOLID <br />WASTE, CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA. <br />This being the time heretofore set for public hearing on the above ordinance, proponents were <br />given the opportunity to be heard, and also opponents. Mr. William J. Richardson, Director of the <br />Department of Public Works, made the presentation for the ordinance. He explained that many pro - <br />blems had been encountered in getting the new program underway; however, he felt it was well on th <br />way to being a success. He indicated that one of the problems had to do with the tremendous amoun <br />of trash to be hauled. He indicated that six additional men were needed at $150.00 per week and <br />that there would be no change in the total budget as presented in revenue sharing by the transfer <br />of this sum. He mentioned that the transfer would probably have to be reinstituted in the fall. <br />He indicated that the transfer would decrease the landfill costs from $20,000 to $15,000 with <br />$5,000 left which would not last beyond August and the maintenance and fuel would also have to be <br />reinstituted. He indicated that, originally, the account for motor equipment was $25,000. The <br />sum of $15,000 could be transferred this year without any further action. He mentioned that the <br />department is in the process of purchasing the flat bed truck. Also, outside of the six additiona <br />men would be the overtime and extra help of $10,800. He concluded by indicating that it was hoped <br />the department could start work in conjunction with the Department of Public Safety regarding yard <br />and alley complaints. <br />Mr. Clouise McCarty, 52174 Oakland Avenue, asked if the charges for the solid waste would be <br />dropped. He thought Mr. Richardson had indicated that the charges would be decreased. Mr. <br />Richardson clarified this point by indicating that the city has and will continue to pay for the <br />dumpings. When the city closed its landfill, there was a surplus bulldozer, and it was sold to <br />the county with the city taking a credit of $20,000 in dumping fees. He indicated that, this <br />month, the credit would be wiped out. The Council had originally appropriated $20,000 for landfil <br />costs, and he was requesting that $15,000 of this be transferred, leaving a $5,000 balance to pay <br />the county. He indicated that, in August, the Council would have to re- appropriate money from the <br />users' fees to continue paying the cost of the dumping. Councilman Miller asked when the revenue <br />from this would reimburse the Federal Assistance Grant. Mr. Richardson indicated that, in the <br />original budget that was passed, a "zero" amount of dollars was set out as far as revenue sharing <br />funds. He was hopeful that the program would be able to pay back in 1974, and he indicated that <br />he had not really projected any figure for that. Councilman Serge asked if complaints about bad <br />alleys and yards should still be referred to the Department of Public Safety even though Public <br />Works and Public Safety would be working in conjunction with each other. Mr. Richardson indicated <br />that the correct procedure to follow was still notifying the Department of Public Safety. In that <br />way, the property would be properly red tagged and if not corrected in a certain amount of time, i <br />would be referred to the Public Works Department to take care of the situation. <br />Councilman Szymkowiak made a motion that the ordinance go to the Council as favorable, seconded by <br />Councilman Kopczynski. The motion carried. <br />ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING $393,983.00 FROM <br />THE FEDERAL ASSISTANCE GRANT FUND, COMMONLY <br />REFERRED TO AS GENERAL REVENUE SHARING, FOR <br />VARIOUS PUBLIC WORKS PROGRAMS, FOR VARIOUS <br />ENVIRONMENTAL AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS <br />IN THE AREA OF PARKS AND RECREATION, TO BE <br />ADMINISTERED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC <br />PARKS OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA. <br />This being the time heretofore set for public hearing on the above ordinance, proponents and <br />opponents were given an opportunity to be heard. Mr. James Seitz, Director of the Departments of <br />Parks and Recreation, made the presentation for the ordinance. He proceeded to outline the line <br />items incorporated in the ordinance. He explained that Program FA23 was a recreation program to <br />open the school gyms and pools during the summer months. He mentioned that the four schools would <br />be Riley, LaSalle, Adams and Washington, and he indicated that it was estimated that over 1,600 <br />persons a week would use the facilities. In Program FA24, he explained that the renovation of <br />Potawatomi Zoo was very important because the zoo was one of the most popular attractions and it <br />had been neglected in the past. He indicated that $100,000 would only be a start for the project <br />and it would involve additional monies in future years and could cost up to $700,000. He indicate <br />that it was estimated that over 200,000 people visited the zoo each year. He expressed concern <br />about the city possibly being ordered to close the present zoo because of its present condition. <br />He explained that part of the money appropriated would be used to hire a planner to help in the <br />design of the project because a detailed plan is needed. He was hopeful that private donations <br />would also be received. In Program FA25, he indicated that lighting was needed at two additional <br />softball diamonds with the renovation of lighting at one ball diamond. He explained that the <br />present lighting system is very antiquated. He mentioned Boland Park and Booth Tarkington Park. <br />In Program FA26, he indicated that the rest rooms were in dire need of repairs. In Program FA27, <br />he indicated that a study committee had been formed to consider the possibility of the Rum Village <br />Nature Education Center. He named the members of the committee. The report from that committee <br />indicated that South Bend was very fortunate in having the park within the city limits as the <br />