Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 26 1973 <br />REGULAR MEETING - RECONVENED (CONTINUED) <br />Mr. Charles Crutchfield, 22045 Roosevelt Road, asked the Council to come forward with a resolution <br />in support of the resolutions Mrs. Frances Wilson had submitted to the Council on the president's <br />cutback of federal funds. He asked that the Council not take this matter lightly, as it has <br />deeper implication than just a cutback of funds. He also indicated that it was true that some of <br />these federal programs have not done their job, but he wanted the Council to take note of the pro- <br />grams that have. He felt that revenue sharing was not the answer, and he asked the Council to use <br />the resolution of the City of Chicago as a guide. He concluded by indicating that there had been <br />a great deal more people present at the meeting who had wanted to speak on this subject but who <br />had to leave the meeting earlier. <br />Mrs. Constance Green, 3217 West Dunham, indicated that the petition Mrs. Wilson had talked about <br />was a copy of the petition that she had given to the Council two weeks ago. She also mentioned <br />that the Council had referred seven ordinances on revenue sharing to committees. She indicated <br />that she would like to go into the committees within the next two weeks and consider that the Mayo: <br />took six evenings of his time and went to the city for discussion on the revenue sharing with the <br />citizens. He then submitted his proposal on revenue sharing shortly after the last meeting. She <br />mentioned that the first two meetings had not gone over well. Also, during the meetings, she <br />pointed out that the citizens asked for many things but one thing they did not ask for was the <br />Civic Center. She mentioned that the president's cutback on types of poverty programs is <br />threatening other programs as well. She mentioned that there is a Democratic Congress with their <br />hands tied. She quoted a figure of 3.6 million dollars being received, and she asked that the <br />Council seriously consider where this money should go. She asked how many people really want the <br />Civic Center. She mentioned that unemployment is a great problem, and she wanted to know how many <br />people would be employed by the Civic Center. She felt that a majority of the people in South Ben( <br />do not want the Civic Center because too much money will be spent on the building. She mentioned <br />that besides the cost of construction of the building, the citizens will still have to pay to use <br />the building by admission to various activities. She indicated that she hoped the Council would <br />not take the same attitude that was taken when she gave them a copy of Mrs. Wilson's petition <br />previously. She felt the Council was responsible to the people and not just a few interest groups <br />Mrs. Helen Otolski, 758 Lombardy, indicated that she wanted to speak on the Kenneth Kwieran matter <br />She mentioned that she was Mr. Kwieran's witness and that she did file a complaint with the Police <br />Department and the patrol car had arrived about 30 minutes late, and by that time, the kids had <br />disappeared. She mentioned that she had given the police the necessary information about the <br />incident and nothing had been done about it. She also mentioned that she had called the police on <br />the matter involving the car hitting the utility pole. She said she had waited for the police and <br />no one had come to investigate the situation. She wanted to get some idea on what type of protec- <br />tion the citizens can expect from their Police Department. She mentioned that the kids are drivin( <br />all over the lawns on Lombardy Drive, and the residents hoped that Lombardy could be constantly <br />patrolled with the hopes of stopping this. <br />Mr. Kenneth Kwieran, 730 Lombardy, stated that he felt Mr. Gallagher had humiliated him and cut <br />him down in front of the public. He also mentioned that, after the previous Council meeting, the <br />paper had published things that he had not said. After the last meeting, he had left with a <br />feeling that something could be done and that he would receive some help with his problem. He <br />indicated that he had come to this meeting only to be humiliated and he had thought that a solu- <br />tion to the problem could be found. He announced that he had seen 10 police cars stopped at the <br />White House Restaurant one day and it was the truth; he did not like to be called a liar, and he <br />did not like Mr. Gallagher's implications. He also mentioned that he was able to see Mr. Gallaghe: <br />as Mr. Gallagher had stated, only he was in the office for about 15 minutes and not 45 minutes. <br />He mentioned the fact that Mr. Gallagher had requested him to bring the witness to his office; <br />however, he indicated that he had to work every day and could not always take off work when he <br />wanted. He felt that many times, people are afraid to come forward because when their names are <br />known, they are harassed. He also stated that Mr. Gallagher had indicated there was no damage to <br />the lawns, and he maintained that there is damage because he had seen it. He mentioned that Mr. <br />Gallagher had not been out to his property to investigate the damage so how would he be aware that <br />there was damage. He also mentioned that, as far as the car hitting the telephone pole, he had: <br />seen it happen and nothing had been done about it. He felt the west end of the city should be <br />patrolled. He admitted that there has been no damage within the past week and that recently, the <br />patrol cars had been driving through the area and shining their spot lights into the homes. He <br />briefly mentioned that he had read the city ordinance on the sidewalks and parkways and cars being <br />prohibited to these areas. He asked the City Attorney to speak to the Council on his behalf as <br />Mr. Roemer had investigated the damage personally and would be able to give an honest account of <br />the situation. City Attorney Roemer indicated that, in his opinion, the damage was more than <br />minor. He had been advised by the School Corporation that the damage to the school lawn was minor <br />and they would not prosecute. He felt the collective proglem was that there are plenty of houses <br />in that area that have been damaged. He mentioned that the Council had asked him to look into the <br />matter in regard to police response. He indicated that he had gone to Mr. Kwieran's house to <br />investigate. He had asked Mr. Kwieran if he had gotten a response to his telephone calls and Mr. <br />Kwieran had indicated that he had. He had also asked Mr. Kwieran if the officers had been civil <br />to him and Mr. Kwieran had indicated that they had been. He indicated that Mr. Kwieran could not <br />identify the driver of the automobile, and he felt this was not a prosecutable matter as far as Mr, <br />Kwieran's property was concerned; however, the school property is prosecutable only they say the <br />damage is minor. Because of these facts, he informed the Council that the police cannot take any <br />legal action because they cannot develop a case. He indicated that the police have been patrollin( <br />the area and there was a stake -out one evening. Mr. Kwieran indicated that he was not "knocking" <br />the Police Department, but he felt they were not getting the patrol cars out on the west end of <br />town. Councilman Serge felt that, at the present time, the Police Department was not manned <br />enough to take care of the problem. Councilman Kopczynski agreed with Mr. Kwieran on the problem <br />of the patrol cars on the west end of town. He asked if Mr. Gallagher had personally gone out and <br />taken a look at the damage, and Mr. Gallagher answered that he had not. Councilman Kopczynski <br />stated that, in Mr. Gallagher's opinion, the citizens should determine what type of service they <br />want from their Police Department. He mentioned that each area has its own problems and a problem) <br />in one area might be minor in a certain section and much more serious in another. He explained a <br />problem that had occurred in his neighborhood in the past about a family who operated everything <br />from motorcycles with no mufflers to snowmobiles. He mentioned that this problem went on for nine <br />years and it could never be cleared up. Fortunately, the family had moved away and the neighbor- <br />hood became peaceful again. He indicated that he had been contacted by the people in Mr. Kwieran' <br />area day after day and he felt it was time that the Police Department was responsible to the peopl <br />