Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 11, 1972 <br />RESOLUTION NO. 326 -72 (CONTINUED) <br />overall credit. Councilman Kopczynski asked what the project life was. Mr. Richardson said it <br />was about five years. Mr Glenn Barbe of the Department of Redevelopment said that this is the <br />second action year of a three year program. Councilman Kopczynski asked how much more the pro- <br />ject would cost the city. Mr. Richardson said our total cost is 25% of the total amount to be <br />spent in the area and that it would involve a total project cost of between $600,000 and $650,000. <br />Councilman Taylor moved that the resolution be adopted, seconded by Councilman Szymkowiak. The <br />resolution was adopted by a roll call vote of nine ayes (Councilmen Serge, Szymkowiak, Miller, <br />Parent, Taylor, Kopczynski, Horvath Newburn andNemeth). <br />RESOLUTION NO. 327 -72 A RESOLUTION APPROVING APPLICATION FOR <br />"RECERTIFICATION OF WORKABLE PROGRAM FOR <br />COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT. <br />WHEREAS, an application for Recertification of the Workable Program for Community Improvement has <br />been filed with the Common Council of the City of South Bend, which report is now before the <br />Common Council of the City of South Bend, which report is now before the Common Council; and <br />WHEREAS, the approval of the Common Council to said application is required by the Department of <br />Housing and Urban Development of the United States of America as a continuing requisite for the <br />City of South Bend's eligibility to receive federal funds; and <br />WHEREAS, the Common Council has examined said report and finds it satisfactory; <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of South Bend, that the report <br />captioned "Applocation for Recertification of the Workable Program for Community Improvement" be <br />submitted for recertification. <br />Adopted this 11 day of September 1972. <br />/s/ Odell Newburn <br />Member of the Common Council of the City of <br />South Bend. <br />A public hearing was held on the resolution at this time. Dr. John Kromkowski, Director of Human <br />Resources, said that the Workable Program document covers four general areas: housing, code <br />enforcement, planning and citizen involvement. Recertification is required every two years as <br />a prerequisite for federal funding. The program includes systematic code enforcement of housing, <br />but not house to house inspection, in areas which have blatant code violations. citizen involve- <br />ment would be expanded with the Director of Human Resources pulling together planning functions <br />of federal activities and city activities. HUD has insisted that citizens be part of the planning <br />and consulation for activities that affect the physical and human aspects of their lives. The <br />program will undergo intensive review within the next six months. Dr. Kromkowski said that the <br />document grows out of long consultation and planning and the Council has had the document for 21 <br />days for study and review. Funding will be sought for 1000 public housing units, 200 of which <br />are to be completed within the next two years. Councilman Nemeth questioned Dr. Kromkowski about <br />changes to be made in the document and Dr. Kromkowski said that changes were being made on page 4, <br />6, 7, 8, and 9 and that a citizen participation appendix was being added to the document. Mrs. <br />Lee Swan, 2022 Swygart Street, asked Dr. Kromkowski about the house to house inspection which has <br />caused a great deal of concern among the citizens. Dr. Kromkowski said this was changed on the <br />insistence of citizen groups with which they have met. Instead, a visual survey of homes will be <br />made in areas where there are many violations. Councilman Nemeth said that some of the citizens <br />who changed the Workable Program in regard to house to house inspection were members of the <br />Common Council. Councilman Taylor said that he would like to.point something out regarding <br />citizen participation because it might eventually lead to war against HUD. When the Council first <br />received copies of the Workable Program, it gave the power to neighborhood groups to veto deci- <br />sions made-by the Mayor and the Common Council. During the discussions conducted over the past <br />several days, this section has been stricken. Councilman Taylor said that when HUD says to the <br />City and to the Council that a neighborhood group is going to have veto power over the elected <br />officials of the City and the elected Council of the City, then city government is no more. <br />Councilman Newburn said that he thought there was a misinterpretation on the part of some indivi- <br />duals as to the veto power and that it was really calling for a joint agreement between the <br />people and public officials. Councilman Miller said that the Director of Human Resources will <br />have an officer for Community Development and asked how it would be funded. Dr. Kromkowski said <br />that the federal government will fund this position. Councilman Miller then asked, if the city <br />is going to ask for funding for 1000 housing units, is 200 enough to ask for the next two years <br />or should it be more? Mr. O'Brien of the Housing Autbority said that at the present time there <br />is a waiting list of 375 for housing units, for the elderly and moderate income families as well <br />as low income familites. The problem with requesting more units at the present time is that it <br />is difficult to get adequate housing sites in the City of South Bend. The Housing Authority is <br />moving as rapidly as it can. Councilman Miller asked about the reference in the document on <br />Page 14 to Kelly Park and the old County Court House. Dr. Kromkowski said that the Kelly Park <br />applicationwas put in but that the Council did not fund it. A program is always dependent on <br />local funding. Councilman Miller asked the meaning of the term "legacy of parks ". Dr. Kromkowski <br />said that that is the federal code name for parks being funded through HUD. Councilman Parent <br />said that he felt the reference to Kelly Park should be left in the document. He said he feels the <br />plan is a good beginning. Some areas have obviously been neglected and some areas will have to <br />be improved. He said that he would vote for the plan because it is a good beginning and because <br />it will be reviewed every six months. Councilman Newburn asked for some information as to why <br />the restoration of the old County Court House is included in the program. Mayor Miller said that <br />an application was made to HUD 18 months ago by the County Commissioners for money for this <br />program. The first phase of the project was in the neighborhood of $40,000 to $50,000 to be re- <br />imbursed by HUD. It is a county project but is in the Workable Program because it is in the City <br />of South Bend. Councilman Miller made a motion to amend Page 14, Section E by deleting "and the <br />development of the Kelly Playground located in the Northeast Neighborhood. Applications for both <br />projects have been submitted to HUD under the Legacy of Parks concept ", and by changing the last <br />sentence to read "Cost for this project will be in the vicinity of $250,000 ". The motion was <br />seconded by Councilman Kopczynski and was carried. Councilman Nemeth said "In regard to citizen <br />participation, I feel that I am a citizen participating in government. This is the traditional <br />concept of citizens' involvement in government. The ultimate responsibility should be on the <br />Council and on the Mayor as elected representatives of their constituents. No non - elected group <br />should have veto power over elected officials ". Councilman Taylor moved for adoption of the <br />resolution, seconded by Councilman Kopczynski. The resolution was adopted by a roll call vote of <br />nine ayes (Councilmen Serge, Szymkowiak, Miller, Parent, Taylor, Kopczynski, Horvath, Newburn <br />and Nemeth). <br />