Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING MAY 1, 1972 <br />PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED <br />Mrs. Barbara Vaszari, 830 S. Falcon Street, spoke for the ordinance. She said that she is a <br />housewife and that she was very impressed with the mayor's presentation of the government re- <br />structuring and feels that the ordinance should pass for the good of the future of South Bend. <br />Mrs. Janet Allen, 125 West Marion Street, said that as a member of the Chamber of Commerce, she <br />had not been informed about the resolution adopted by the Chamber and read before this meeting <br />tonight. She said that she did not support the resolution. She said that some city departments <br />have already been reorganized without this ordinance and called attention to the fact that three <br />assistant engineers had been hired by the City Engineer whose salaries are not in the budget. <br />She questioned whether the Ford Grant Mayor Miller mentioned as a possible means of financing <br />new cabinet style departments had ever come through. She said the Director of Safety would <br />appear to be a social service department which might require two assistants, a secretary, and <br />funds for other personnel and supplies. The position of Safety Director was put into the 1970 <br />budget at $17,500 but was deleted as unnecessary. She questioned the advisability of putting <br />an extra person between the Fire Department and Police Department and the Mayor. She emphasized <br />the fact that it was not the initial cost of such departments but their upkeep. She said that <br />the ordinance gives the power to establish within the dpeartments such additional officers and <br />bureaus as are deemed necessary. She continued that this ordinance would not simplify government <br />but would be opening Pandora's box. She said there is no need for more highly paid department <br />heads to demand a full day -'s work for a full day's pay to deliver the services to the people. <br />She urged the Council to further study the ordinance. <br />Mr. Charles Hahn,,.1619 E. Colfax Avenue, President of the Civic Planning Association, said that <br />as an interested citizen he had studied the ordinance first presented and the amended one and <br />that it would take much more study to fully understand it. He said that the Civic Planning <br />Association is concerned that the Park Department not lose its bonding power. He said that the <br />Association supports a cabinet type of government but, since the amended ordinance was just <br />available Friday, perhaps more time should be spent in studying it before the Council votes. <br />Councilman Nemeth made a motion that the Council adjourn for a ten minute recess. Seconded by <br />several and carried. Adjourned at 10:15 p.m. <br />Be it remembered that the meeting of the Committee of the Whole reconvened at 10:30 p.m. in the <br />Council Chambers of the County -City Building with nine members present, Chairman Newburn <br />presiding. <br />Public Hearing Continued on Ordinance to Restructure Government <br />Mr. Lowell Spalding, 3422 Woldhaven Drive, spoke in favor of the ordinance. He said he wondered <br />if the women who said we are still operating under a Constitution and Bill of Rights written over <br />200 years ago would like to be living without the amendment which gave women the right to vote <br />and the 26th amendment. He said that it is better to try to livein the 20th century, looking <br />into the 21st century. <br />Mr. Edwin T. Smith, of the South Bend Civic Planning Association, said that the Council members <br />and members of the city administration had received letters outlining the Association's feelings <br />and recommendations on the ordinance. <br />Miss Virginia Guthrie, Executive Secretary of the Civic Planning Association, said that there <br />now have been three versions of this ordinance in a short time. The 41 page ordinance, a five <br />page ordinance and now a seven page ordinance with considerable changes. There are gaps between <br />the three ordinances. She asked what the effective date on the ordinance would be. She recom- <br />mended that (1) the Council consider not taking final action until May 8 1972,,and (2) that <br />they consider making the Human Resources Department effective the lst of June or the 1st of July. <br />She recommended that the ordinance not take effect until January 1, 1973 to provide an opportunit <br />to study the realignment of the budget. <br />Mr. Joseph Guentert complained that this public hearing was held at the same time as the public <br />hearing by the School Board and said that many governmental meetings are held in conflict with <br />one another so that interested citizens cannot attend all of the meetings. He said that the <br />bureaucratic, appointive system of government is removed from the participation of the people. <br />Mayor Miller spoke again for the ordinance. He said that the ordinance would not affect city and <br />county elected officials. He said that the Council had studied the ordinance and made recommended <br />changes, and that the state law now provides for the cabinet style of government in South Bend. <br />He said that the two new positions being created would not involve additional costs as they <br />would make cuts in other departments to fund these. He said that the new restructuring will <br />result in economy and in better service to the community. The Council would have to approve any <br />additional money. <br />Mr. William Richardson, City Engineer, answered a question raised about three assistant engineers <br />hired in his department. He said that it was merely a matter of realigning of titles and respon- <br />sibilities and was possible within his existing budget. <br />Councilman Nemeth said that the proposed ordinance, on page four, calls for the director of each <br />department to prepare and submit a report for the preceding fiscal year. He asked if this in- <br />cluded the Water Works. Mayor Miller answered that this would apply to every department of <br />government, including the Water Works. - <br />Councilman Horvath asked if Stanley Ladd was speaking for the unions or for himself. Phil Crone, <br />Chairman of the UAW -CAP Council, said that the CAP Council had taken no action on the ordinance, <br />but had asked the Council for a 30 day delay in voting on the ordinance. He said that they had <br />met with members of the administration and had had their questions answered and were now retracti <br />the request for the delay. <br />Councilman Kopczynski asked the Mayor where cuts in the existing budget would be made to pay the <br />additional expenses. Mayor Miller replied that the Controller was studying the budget and <br />would decide where the cuts would be made. <br />