Laserfiche WebLink
597 <br />REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 13, 1976 <br />COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING (CONTINUED) <br />Council President Parent made a motion to amend the ordinance, seconded by Council Member Adams. <br />The motion carried. Mr. Richard Johnson, Director of Area Plan, said the passage of this ordi- <br />nance was important and it will help to stabilize neighborhoods. He said that Area Plan re- <br />commended this ordinance favorably to the Common Council. Mr. Richard Muessel, real estate <br />appraiser, indicated he had extensive experience in making valuations of property being condemne <br />in which the areas were blighted. He said in his opinion adult businesses were a sign of an <br />advancing blight condition. Vincent Smith, Special Operations Officer of the Police Department <br />spoke regarding the correlation between adult businesses and the crime ratio in the City. Mrs. <br />Arlene Quigley, 1019 N. Francis, read the following statement: <br />TO: MEMBERS OF THE SOUTH BEND CITY COUNCIL <br />FROM: Northeast Neighborhood Council <br />SUBJECT: Ordinance #4990 -68 <br />The Northeast Neighborhood Council has on several occasions expressed its interest in the devel <br />ment of an ordinance limiting the spread of "adult businesses" in residential neighborhoods. <br />We have talked with Mayor Nemeth and his Administrative Assistant, Mr. Carrington, Mr. Thomas <br />Brunner, City Attorney, our Councilman Roger Parent and to the Alcoholic Beverage Commission. <br />Our particular neighborhood's problem is one of too many taverns or bars (5) in very close <br />proximity to an "A" Residential" area: The five -point corners of South Bend Avenue, Eddy and <br />Corby Blvd., plus the corner of North Notre Dame Avenue and Howard Streets and the tavern at the <br />corner of South Bend Ave., and Notre Dame Avenue in a "B Residential" general area. (there is <br />one family -type bar to which we have no objection.) <br />Our residents are continually harrassed by the noise of broken bottles, loud and profane <br />language, roaring automobile engines and horns, trespassing on lawns and property, the blocking <br />of driveways and garages and other general disturbances, particularly on weekends during the <br />early hours of the morning. Tavern goers roam from one establishment to the other carrying on <br />loud conversations with each other without regard to the hour -- sometimes 2 to 4 a.m. This has <br />a very disasterious effect on one's ability to sleep. <br />We are also concerned for those other areas of the City that are having difficulties with adult <br />book stores, adult motion picture theatres and cabarets. Our Council feels that these types <br />of businesses are very detrimental to the well -being of any neighborhood and tend to attract <br />an element which the City of South Bendcbes not want or need. <br />We are, therefore, delighted that an ordinance amending Chapter 21 of the City Code of South <br />Bend, known as Ordinance #4990 -68, has been introduced and we urge you to pass it with all due <br />speed with implementation and enforcement as soon as possible. <br />Arthur J. Quigley, President <br />NORTHEAST NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL <br />cc: Mr. Roger Parent, Pres. City Council <br />Mr. Thomas Brunner, City Attorney <br />Council Member Serge indicated there was an adult book store moving in his area and he wanted to <br />know if the ordinance was passed could they be stopped. Mr. Brunner indicated that if the pro- <br />perty was purchased for that purpose, the City would have a problem in making this retroactive. <br />Council Member Szymkowiak made a motion that this ordinance be recommended to the Council favor- <br />ably, as amended, seconded by Council Member Dombrowski. The motion carried. <br />ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 4990 -68, AS <br />AMENDED, COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE <br />OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA (CHAPTER 21, <br />MUNICIPAL CODE) (100 BLOCK OF EAST NORTH SHORE <br />DRIVE). <br />This being the time heretofore set for public hearing on the above ordinance, proponents and op- <br />ponents were given an opportunity to be heard. Mr. Jack Dunfee, attorney representing the peti- <br />tioners, said that on December 30, 1976, he sent a letter to Mr. Parent withdrawing the petition <br />initiated by the property owners. Mr. Parent, representing the Fourth District, said he was <br />concerned about the Harter Heights Area. He said the petition was filed and there was an ordi- <br />nance before the Council. He said he was requesting the Council to continue the public hearing <br />on this ordinance until the January 24 meeting of the Council, in order to have additional time <br />to study the questions raised. He said it appears the petitioners thought the area was zoned <br />"A" and the attorney has done some research and found a 1946 ordinance which rezoned the propert <br />to "B ". He made a mtoion the ordinance be continued until January 24, seconded by Council Membe <br />Dombrowski. The motion carried. Council Member Miller indicated it was normally the Council's <br />practice to let the public speak regarding the issue. Mr. Norman Crowe, 315 Peashway, discussed <br />their neighborhood association's reasons for opposing the rezoning. Council President Parent ma <br />a motion to recess, seconded by Council Member Dombrowski. The motion carried and the meeting w <br />recessed at 8:37 and reconvened at 8:57. <br />ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING $18,000 FROM THE FEDERAL <br />ASSISTANCE GRANT COMMONLY REFERRED TO AS GENERAL <br />REVENUE SHARING, FOR VARIOUS CODE ENFORCEMENT PRO - <br />GRAMS, TO BE ADMINISTERED BY THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND <br />THROUGH ITS DEPARTMENT OF LAW. <br />Council Member Adams made a motion to continue public hearing on this ordinance until January 4, <br />1977, seconded by Council Member Taylor. The motion carried. <br />