Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING MAY 27, 1975 <br />COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING (CONTINUED) <br />been some minor items not yet completed which represented a small part of the total construction <br />cost. Because of these minor items, the project had not been turned over as it was not determined <br />complete. He indicated that a great majority of the project work had been completed. Council <br />President Parent wondered how much longer the bills could be postponed for electricity. Mr. Farra <br />indicated that, if the Council wished, the lights could be turned off and no additional electricit <br />expense would be incurred until the matter was resolved. Council President Parent felt it was the <br />Redevelopment Department incurring the bills at this time. Mr. Farrand indicated that Redevelopme <br />felt otherwise. He asked that the Council give him some guidelines on what was expected from his <br />department concerning the downtown mall maintenance. Councilman Serge wondered about the total <br />amount of bills outstanding at the present time. Mr. Farrand indicated that the Redevelopment <br />Department could discuss its outstanding obligations with the Council. He stated that he could no <br />answer that question. Councilman Kopczynski stated that he had requested the full accounting of <br />all federal programs in the community several times in the past. He stated that this information <br />had never been received. He stated that the money was being concentrated in the downtown mall <br />area. He felt this could not be continued and, as long as it continued, he would not vote for <br />appropriating money for the downtown area without being fair to the outlying areas of the city. <br />He wondered about the speculation of a proposed 10% reduction in street lighting for the coming <br />year. Mr. Farrand indicated that he was not aware of any street lighting reduction being dis- <br />cussed. Councilman Kopczynski asked if there were any figures for the cost of street lighting nex <br />year, and Mr. Farrand indicated that the city would be budgeting $670,000. He stated that the cos <br />this year was better than a $100,000 less. <br />Councilman Nemeth stated that many questions asked by the Council had remained , unanswered. For <br />this reason, he made a motion that the ordinance be continued until the next meeting in order that <br />the Department of Redevelopment could provide answers to the questions, seconded by Councilman <br />Kopczynski. Council President Parent felt the Council should invite Mr. Brownell, Director of the <br />Redevelopment Department, to the next Council meeting in order to clarify some of the questions. <br />Councilman Miller wondered if the Park Board was against maintaining the mall area. Mr. James <br />Seitz, Director of the Department of Public Parks, indicated that, with the proper budget, the <br />department could maintain the mall and would not object to doing so. He stated that he would not <br />like, however, to maintain the mall with an inadequate budget. Councilman Miller felt a "downtowr <br />park" was what was really being considered and the mall could be compared to the cost effective- <br />ness of the parks. In terms of use, there were probably many more people in the downtown mall <br />area than in some of the city's parks. He stated that the Council had never taken a stand on how <br />the maintenance of the mall should be handled. He felt this was a concern. He stated that he <br />would like to see the Park Department involved in the matter. Councilman Horvath felt the budget <br />was not as large as it appeared to be. He felt there was maintenance of the area before the mall <br />was constructed. When the mall was constructed, it was agreed that the merchants could help in <br />maintaining the flowers, trees, etc. He wondered how much extra money was really being used for <br />maintenance. He felt the merchants should help in the maintenance of the mall area, and he hoped <br />some input from the merchants could be received. The motion carried. Mr. Farrand asked the <br />Council's permission to pay the electric bills incurred. Chairman Newburn indicated that it was <br />the Council's wish to delay action on the ordinance. For this reason, he felt everything else <br />connected with the maintenance should be delayed also. Councilman Miller felt the Council should <br />go on record and not recommend that the lights be turned off, and that the city would pay for its <br />obligations regarding electric current. He felt the mall should be maintained in a first -class <br />manner. Council President Parent made a motion to close debate, seconded by Councilman Kopczynsk: <br />Chairman Newburn indicated that there was no debate and that the Council should proceed with the <br />next item on the agenda. <br />ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING $252,800.00 <br />FROM THE FEDERAL ASSISTANCE GRANT, COMMONLY <br />REFERRED TO AS GENERAL REVENUE SHARING, FOR <br />VARIOUS PUBLIC WORKS PROGRAMS, TO BE ADMIN- <br />ISTERED BY THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND THROUGH <br />ITS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. <br />This being the time heretofore set for public hearing on the above ordinance, proponents and <br />opponents were given an opportunity to be heard. Mr. Rollin Farrand, Director of the Department <br />of Public Works, made the presentation for the ordinance. He explained that he was requesting <br />approval of funds for the second quarter in the amount of $252,800 in order to make up the <br />$300,000 needed to complete the paving and slurry seal programs for this year. <br />Councilman Kopczynski wondered why the Council had not been furnished a street program layout. <br />He felt the Council was not given any input into the program and that many citizens' requests <br />were not considered because of this. Mr. Farrand indicated that the department had reflected the <br />requests of the councilmen over the last year. Councilman Kopczynski indicated that he had asked <br />for an opportunity to discuss various requests with the Bureau of Streets Manager and had not bee3 <br />given that opportunity. Council President Parent indicated that the Council had met in caucus <br />with Mr. Farrand concerning the program. He felt the Council had been given the opportunity to <br />discuss the matter. He indicated that perhaps Councilman Kopczynski had not been present at that <br />meeting. Councilman Serge indicated that a street layout had been received by the Council. He <br />indicated that his street had been paved prior to the election and he had not requested that this <br />be done. He expressed disapproval with that. Councilman Szymkowiak felt that the councilmen had <br />not been consulted regarding the paving of the streets within the respective districts. He state( <br />that the councilmen were responsible to the citizens and knew of the citizens' requests concernini <br />paving of the streets. Mr. Farrand stated that all the councilmen had had input into the program <br />He indicated that he was aware of their requests simply by discussing certain matters with them. <br />He felt he had not ignored their requests concerning paving priorities. Councilman Taylor stated <br />that he felt his relationship with the Department of Public Works and Mr. Farrand was very good, <br />and he had always had the opportunity for input into the various programs. He requested a street <br />light at the corner of Ireland and Fellows Street. <br />Councilman Nemeth made a motion that the ordinance be recommended favorably to the Common Council <br />seconded by Councilman Taylor. The motion carried. <br />There being no further business to come before the Committee of the Whole, Councilman Horvath mad <br />a motion to rise and report to the Council, seconded by Councilman Taylor. The motion carried. <br />A short recess was requested by Councilman Taylor. Recessed at 8.45 p.m. <br />ATTEST: ATTE <br />CITY CLERK CHAIRMAN <br />t <br />