Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 10, 1975 <br />REGULAR MEETING - RECONVENED (CONTINUED) <br />the city could "go alone" on the project, and Mr. Byers indicated that, as MACOG interpreted the <br />guidelines, the program was areawide. Councilman Taylor indicated that he would support the <br />resolution; however, he was bothered about funds coming from Washington, D.C., and he felt this <br />should be done in a flexible way. He felt that, in the past, block grants have lacked flexibility <br />Mr. Byers indicated that he agreed with Councilman Taylor's remark. <br />Councilman Miller made a motion to reluctantly adopt the resolution, seconded by Councilman Taylor <br />The resolution was adopted by a roll call vote of six ayes (Councilmen Serge, Miller, Taylor, <br />Nemeth, Newburn and Parent), one nay (Councilman Szymkowiak) and one abstention (Councilman <br />Kopczynski). Councilman Horvath was absent. Councilmen Szymkowiak and Kopczynski were of the <br />opinion that additional information was needed concerning the matter. <br />RESOLUTION <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF <br />THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, <br />ESTABLISHING THE AUTHORITY OF THE <br />MAYOR TO DESIGNATE INDIVIDUALS <br />AUTHORIZED TO DRAW ON A LETTER OF <br />CREDIT EXECUTED FOR GRANTS UNDER <br />TITLE I OF THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY <br />DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1974. <br />A public hearing was held on the resolution at this time. Mr. Walter Lantz, Chief Deputy Controlli <br />explained that the resolution would meet the terms of the Community Development Act in providing <br />the means of the receipt of money distributed to the city. This requirements was not needed in th, <br />past; however, now two individuals must sign in order to draw on a letter of credit, and the <br />resolution was required. He stated that this would apply to any funds received under the Communit: <br />Development Act. Councilman Miller asked for an explanation regarding the letter of credit. Mr. <br />Lantz indicated that a bank must be designated as a depository for the city. A letter of credit <br />was used rather than a check. When this was sent to the bank, the city would sign as a receiver <br />and could then draw on that amount. Councilman Miller asked about the regulations required for <br />drawing out of the account. Mr. Lantz indicated that this would be the same procedure as a checki: <br />account. He stated that the resolution, however, did not deal with the disbursement of the funds. <br />Councilman Serge asked about the signatories, and Mr. Lantz indicated that Mr. Barcome, himself or <br />Mr. Hojnacki could be designated. He stated that all expenditures would be handled through the <br />normal process of approving claims. Councilman Nemeth asked about the normal claim procedure. Mr <br />Lantz indicated that the claims are docketed by the City Clerk and then signed and approved by <br />the Board of Public Works. He stated that the Council also reviews the claims and the State Board <br />of Accounts audits. Councilman Nemeth stated that, in effect, the administration would not be <br />coming back to the Council for expenditures of the money. He wondered which bank was to be <br />designated, and Mr. Lantz indicated that the American National Bank would probably be the <br />depository; however, if a large amount of money was given, it could be distributed among the banks <br />Councilman Nemeth wondered who designated the banks, and Mr. Lantz indicated that the Mayor did. <br />Councilman Nemeth wondered about a budget for the program and the appropriations. He wondered if <br />a resolution could be adopted for expending the funds. Mr. Lantz indicated that he was not talkin, <br />about spending the funds, merely receipt of the funds. Councilman Nemeth stated that he wanted to <br />know about the procedure for expenditure. Council President Parent asked that Mr. Lantz outline <br />for the Council in writing the procedure utilized so that it could be made aware of the situation. <br />Councilman Nemeth made a motion to refer the resolution to the Human Resources Committee until the <br />information requested was received, seconded by Councilman Kopczynski. Mr. William Hojnacki, <br />Director of the Department of Human Resources and Economic Development, indicated that he would <br />provide a circular to the Council explaining the procedure. Councilman Miller wondered if the <br />Council had adopted a similar resolution concerning the Manpower Program. Mr. Lantz indicated tha- <br />a resolution of this sort had never been required in the past and two signatures also were not <br />required before. He explained that the Manpower funds were received by check and a fund was <br />established, with a fund number being assigned. Councilman Miller indicated that the Council was <br />concerned about maintaining its integrity on the supervision of the funds of the city. He stated <br />that, in the manpower area, this was done outside the Council's jurisdiction. He did not want the <br />Community Development funds to escape the Council's jurisdiction. Council President Parent felt <br />the matter was clear in that the resolution dealt with the receipt of money - -not the expenditure <br />of it:. He wondered if there was a problem in delaying the issue temporarily. Mr. Hojnacki <br />indicated that the city was anticipating advance funding within the next two weeks and it could <br />not be received until the resolution was passed. He indicated that a one -year plan would be <br />approved by the Council on the expenditure of funds for the program before it was submitted to the <br />federal government. Council President Parent asked that the public hearing be continued to <br />February 24 rather than just referring the issue to committee. Councilman Nemeth indicated that <br />he would withdraw his original motion. He then made a motion to continue the public hearing on <br />the resolution to the February 24th meeting of the Council and also refer the matter to the Human <br />Resources Committee. Councilman Kopczynski seconded the motion. The motion carried. <br />RESOLUTION NO. 473 -75 <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF <br />THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, <br />APPROVING THE AWARDING OF THIRTEEN <br />CONTRACTS IN EXCESS OF $5,000 FOR <br />REHABILITATION WORK IN THE SOUTHEAST <br />NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM. <br />WHEREAS, under provisions of Ordinance No. 5689 -74, passed by the South Bend <br />Common Council on June 24, 1974, all contracts in the Neighborhood Development Program <br />in excess of $5,000 must be approved by the Common Council; and <br />WHEREAS, low bids for thirteen properties to be rehabilitated under the <br />Neighborhood Development Program have exceeded $5,000. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of South Bend, <br />Indiana: <br />1. That approval be granted to the Redevelopment Commission of the City of South <br />Bend, Indiana, to enter into a contract with Area Services, Inc. for the rehabilitation <br />of the following properties: <br />