Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 13, 1975 <br />COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING (CONTINUED) <br />ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING $10,200.00 FROM <br />THE FEDERAL ASSISTANCE GRANT COMMONLY <br />REFERRED TO AS GENERAL REVENUE SHARING, <br />FOR VARIOUS PUBLIC PARKS PROGRAMS, TO BE <br />ADMINISTERED BY THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND <br />THROUGH ITS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC PARKS. <br />This being the time heretofore set for public hearing on the above ordinance, proponents and <br />opponents were given an opportunity to be heard. Mr. James Seitz, Director of the Department of <br />Public Parks, made the presentation for the ordinance. He explained that the funds being <br />requested would be used to pay for architect and engineering services for plans and specifications <br />for the proposed Pier Park. He indicated that the cost of the fees and development cost for the <br />park had originally been included in the park bond issue that was defeated in November. He stated <br />that the Park Department had received approval of a $75,000 grant from the Department of Natural <br />Resources for the Pier Park development and was in the process of trying to obtain funds for the <br />development so that the city could use the grant. Mr. Gene Evans, Executive Secretary of the <br />Civic Planning Association, wondered if the amount of $10,200 would be the matching funds for the <br />grant. Mr. Seitz indicated that the $75,000 was a match for the total construction of the park, <br />and the grant was approved by the Department of Natural Resources and sent on to the Bureau of <br />(Outdoor Recreation. Mr. Evans wondered if the services had already been contracted, and Mr. Seitz <br />indicated that they had been; however, this was one of the requirements in a bond issue, and it wa <br />very unfortunate that the entire issue had been defeated because of the zoo. Councilman Miller <br />tasked about the total cost of the project. Mr. Seitz indicated that the total cost was $150,000. <br />He stated that the plan was the same as the plan included in the river study. Councilman Miller <br />wondered if the estimate in the river study was $150,000, and Mr. Seitz indicated that he thought <br />the river study plan might have been even more, and he estimated that figure at $170,000. Council <br />Miller wondered if approval had been given to the development of the park, and Mr. Seitz indicated <br />that Councilman Miller had referred to the Bicentennial Park, not the Pier Park. <br />Councilman Serge made a motion that the ordinance be recommended favorably to the Common Council, <br />'seconded by Councilman Szymkowiak. The motion carried. <br />ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING $390,000.00 <br />FROM THE FEDERAL ASSISTANCE GRANT FUND, <br />COMMONLY REFERRED TO AS GENERAL REVENUE SHARING <br />FOR VARIOUS HUMAN RESOURCES PROGRAMS, TO BE <br />ADMINISTERED BY THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND <br />THROUGH ITS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES. <br />This being the time heretofore set for public hearing on the above ordinance, proponents and <br />opponents were given an opportunity to be heard. Mr. William Hojnacki, Director of the Department <br />of Human Resources and Economic Development, made the presentation for the ordinance. He stated <br />that the ordinance merely re- appropriated funds previously approved by the Council for the <br />southeast side development program, funds which were not spent prior to the end of 1974. He assure <br />the Council that the full amount of the money would be expended within the first six months of 197'. <br />Mr. Ed Drummond, 629 West LaSalle, the Grant Coordinator for the Housing Task Force of the Urban <br />Coalition of St. Joseph County, read a statement of the organization supporting the efforts for <br />rehabilitation in the housing area. He indicated that some delays were encountered in the southea! <br />side program, but he felt these delays were justifiable. He indicated that the Housing Task Force <br />was impressed with those persons involved in the program and encouraged because of the increased <br />interest shown by the general contractors. He urged that the Council carry over its commitment of <br />last year. Mr. Daniel Stoltzfus, 409 East Broadway, indicated that he was personally interested <br />in the program because he resided in the southeast side, and he hoped the Council would continue <br />it. Mrs. Hazel Smith, 611 East Wenger Street, indicated that she was enrolled in the t -7 program <br />in the southeast side and she was awaiting the beginning of the rehabilitation of her home. She <br />indicated that she intended to remain as a home owner in the area and would keep her home in good <br />repair after initial rehabilitation. <br />Councilman Kopczynski wondered how many contracts had been let at the present time. Mr. Keith <br />Crighton, Director of the Bureau of Housing, indicated that eight contracts have been recommended <br />for award. The total amount was $41,586 for eight structures. Councilman Kopczynski hoped new <br />housing could be blended with the older homes. Mr. Crighton indicated that new construction far <br />exceeded the cost of rehabilitation. Councilman Kopczynski asked that the Council be kept apprise( <br />of the situation on a monthly basis, if possible, as far as number of persons involved, age of the <br />occupants, etc. He hoped that the money, in the end, would not be "illy spent ". He talked about <br />the LaSalle Park project and the problems encountered. Mr. Crighton indicated that, in that pro- <br />ject, bonding requirements were not necessary; however, in the southeast side program, bonding was <br />necessary. Councilman Miller wondered if a breakdown of the $390,000 was available. Mr. Crighton <br />indicated that the budget followed the previous budget approved by the Council. Councilman Miller <br />wondered how much of the $390,000 would be used for salaries, and Mr. Crighton indicated that none <br />of that money would be used for salaries. Councilman Miller wondered about the percentage used foi <br />the emergencies account. Mr. Crighton indicated that $50,000 was allocated for emergencies and nor <br />profit and could be re- appropriated if not spent. The amount of $4,983 to date had been expended <br />on emergencies. Councilman Miller indicated that at least $350,000 would be used for actual <br />rehabilitation of the homes if that was the case, and Mr. Crighton indicated that Councilman Millet <br />was correct. Councilman Miller wondered if there was any provision in the Redevelopment program <br />for refunding back any of the funds appropriated. Mr. Hojnacki indicated that he could not answer <br />that question at this time; however, he felt that could not be accomplished. He felt this would <br />have to be appropriated for at the time of the advance, and this had not been done. Councilman <br />Miller requested that the Council be informed as the money is spent and the contracts come up. Mr, <br />Crighton indicated that the $390,000 would be expended by the June 30th deadline. Councilman Serge <br />wondered if the Council could request an inspection of the rehabilitated homes after the work was <br />accomplished. He requested that this be done, and Mr. Crighton indicated that the Bureau of Housii <br />inspects and the Building Department is contacted for inspection of the electrical and plumbing woi <br />Councilman Serge asked that a list be forwarded to him showing the inspectors, their recommendation <br />and the homes inspected. Councilman Szymkowiak felt the inspection should be accomplished while <br />the homes were being rehabilitated, perhaps on a weekly basis. Councilman Nemeth asked when the <br />Community Development funds for rehabilitation would become available, and Mr. Hojnacki indicated <br />that the funds would be available 75 days after the application was submitted which would be on or <br />