Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 12, 1974 <br />REGULAR MEETING - RECONVENED (CONTINUED) <br />RESOLUTION NO. 441 -74 (CONTINUED) <br />WHEREAS, allegations of misconduct charges within the South Bend Police Department <br />have been made by a group ot'officers; and <br />WHEREAS, the allegations have been made to overlook enforcement of laws in certain <br />areas of the city; and <br />WHEREAS, the public in general, from time to time, has made complaints about the <br />manner in which the Police Department responds to citizens' calls for police service. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of South Bend, <br />Indiana: <br />SECTION 1. That a public investigation be made of the South Bend Police Department <br />by the Common Council and any other personnel deemed necessary for a thorough investigation <br />of the above allegations and other matters to insure that the Police Department will serve <br />the citizens in an impartial, efficient and courteous manner. <br />SECTION 2. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its <br />passage by the Common Council and approval by the Mayor. <br />s/ Walter T. Kopczynski <br />Member of the Common Council <br />A public hearing was held on the resolution at this time. Councilman Kopczynski indicated that he <br />felt the citizens had a right to know what was going on in the Police Department. He felt this <br />investigation should be made public and the administration should not make the investigation of <br />one of its own departments. He also felt that the Council should investigate the department <br />because it was a duty entrusted to it by state law. He talked about the various complaints <br />received in the past on the kind of police service the citizens were receiving. He felt the <br />department operated under "a veil of secrecy ", and he wanted a public investigation to make the <br />facts known to the citizens. He stated that it was the Council's duty to investigate the Police <br />Department and restore the confidence the people should have in that department. He urged the <br />Council to adopt the resolution and take the necessary steps to correct the problems within the <br />Police Department. <br />Mr. Maurice Cohen, 725 East Eckman Street, felt the Council should conduct an investigation. He <br />felt it would not be feasible to have the Crime Commission conduct the investigation, and he also <br />urged passage of the resolution. Mr. James Russell, 1517 North Fremont, again brought up the subji <br />of police brutality. Council President Nemeth stated that the resolution re- states the responsibi: <br />given the Council by law; however, the Crime Commission had been created in order to make recommen• <br />dations concerning the department. He felt that the Crime Commission should go first and make its <br />recommendations, if necessary. Then the Council could go ahead and make its recommendations. He <br />urged that the Mayor propose a request for revenue sharing funds for the Crime Commission in order <br />to get the commission off the ground. He felt the Council would not "shirk its responsibility ". <br />Miss Virginia Guthrie, Consultant and member of the Board of Directors of the Civic Planning <br />Association, stated that a series of meetings have been held and a report would be made shortly <br />concerning the commission's findings and recommendations. She indicated that the commission was <br />waiting for word on whether or not the state police would enter the picture. Mr. James Barcome, <br />City Controller, indicated that an ordinance proposing $7,500 for the Crime Commission would be <br />forthcoming at the next Council meeting: Mrs. Janet Allen, 125 West Marion Street, disagreed with <br />the use of revenue sharing funds for the Crime Commission. She stated that she endorsed the con - <br />cept of the proposed resolution. Councilman Taylor indicated that the original concept of the <br />Crime Commission had been his idea and Council President Nemeth had written the ordinance. He <br />talked about the lack of trust between the citizens and the city officials. He stated that he did <br />not approve of all the "pre- judgment" that was being made. He stated that the Council placed no <br />restrictions on the Crime Commission and had no control over the commission. He stated that the <br />Mayor had no power over the commission either. He felt the commission was a citizens' commission <br />as it was intended to be, and he stated that he agreed with the statements made by Council Presides <br />Nemeth concerning the proposed resolution. Councilman Parent stated that, on one hand, people fee: <br />the Council should look into the matter, and on the other hand, the Crime Commission would not be <br />objective in making recommendations. He felt there was no logic in that. He felt the Crime <br />Commission and the state police and prosecutor would be able to accomplish the job. If not, the <br />Council could step in and take over., Councilman Szymkowiak felt that the money should be appro- <br />priated for the Crime Commission in order that it could start the investigation. He agreed with <br />the proposed resolution; however, he felt the Crime Commission should conduct the investigation. <br />He felt the proposed resolution could be used "as the arm needed." to complete the investigation, <br />if necessary. For that reason, Councilman Szymkowiak indicated that he would vote in favor of the <br />resolution. Mr. Kenneth Fedder, Deputy County Prosecutor, spoke on behalf of the prosecutor's <br />staff. He stated that he had caused a telegram to be sent to Governor Bowen to have the state <br />police conduct the investigation. He stated that eventually the personnel assigned to the inves- <br />tigation would come from other parts of Indiana, and the investigation would not be conducted by <br />the prosecutor's office. He stated that a meeting would be held and it would be requested that the <br />state police and the Crime Commission would investigate the issue. Councilman Kopczynski stated <br />that, when the investigation was complete, the Council should thoroughly study the recommendations. <br />Councilman Kopczynski made a motion that the resolution be adopted, seconded by Councilman Szymkow: <br />Mr. Russell wondered about a public hearing so that the citizens would be aware of the issue. Mr. <br />Fedder stated that this would have to be determined by the state police and the Crime Commission. <br />He stated that the investigation was being culminated. There was a call for the question. The <br />resolution was adopted by a roll call vote of nine ayes (Councilmen Serge, Szymkowiak, Miller, <br />Parent, Taylor, Kopczynski, Horvath, Newburn and Nemeth). <br />Councilman Taylor made a motion to recess, seconded by Councilman Szymkowiak. The motion carried, <br />and the Council recessed at 12:15 p.m. Reconvened at 12:25 p.m. <br />ORDINANCES, FIRST READING <br />ct <br />ity <br />it <br />Gak. <br />