Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF SOUTH BEND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING – September 11, 2025 <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />Upon a motion by Eli Wax for approval, seconded by David Relos, the <br />motion carried unanimously; the Commission approved Resolution No. <br />3648 as presented on September 11, 2025. <br /> <br />3. Second Amendment to Development Agreement (The Monreaux) <br /> <br />Erik Glavich, Director of Growth and Opportunity, presented this <br />Second Amendment to the development agreement and pointed out <br />that the draft that was provided in the packet has a change in language <br />at the top of page 2, Proposed 1.2 in the draft included in the packet <br />which reads; “Subject to annual appropriation by the Commission to <br />simultaneously reimburse the city for its costs incurred or to be <br />incurred through the loan agreement”. The final version for <br />consideration and presented to the Commission changes the words <br />“for its costs incurred, or to be incurred” was changed to “for advances <br />the city has made, or will make, through the loan agreement”. <br /> <br />The amendment is for $303,000 for siding upgrades. The First <br />Amendment to the Development Agreement only included the <br />forgivable loan portion and did not contain the standard language <br />typically used in agreements for local public improvement projects. <br />Through negotiations with the developer, we’ve now added back in that <br />standard language. We also clarified the developer’s commitments and <br />how we’ll verify when those commitments are met. For example, you’ll <br />see a reference to an affidavit of completion in the updated agreement. <br />With the amendments, the developer’s private investment commitment <br />for the project has increased by $4 million, going from $13.7 million to <br />$17.7 million. <br /> <br />Both Commissioner Wax and Relos stated they had reservations; <br />however, they want the project to succeed and approve of the value <br />engineering and design upgrades. Mr. Glavich stated that while <br />working with Ms. Peters, the goal was to restore some of the building’s <br />aesthetic features to better match the neighborhood’s character. He <br />then showed an image with a proposed design showing more defined <br />architectural elements—like changing the upper siding from gray to red <br />and using darker brick on the lower portion. These updates are <br />considered more visually appealing for this part of downtown. <br /> <br />The quote for these changes from her contractor came to $303,000 <br />which is the amount of the proposed increase in the Funding Amount. <br />It’s important to note that the amendment being considered does not <br />commit the city to purchasing the siding alone, it’s part of a broader <br />discussion. <br />