Laserfiche WebLink
i <br />Douglas L. Carpenter & Associates inc. <br />LAND APPRAISAL REPORT File No. BROW17 <br />Borrower BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS consul Tract 29 <br />Property Addri e, 317 A. BROADWAY Map Reference 7800 <br />City spu7w BRM ceuntyST JOSEPH Staia IN <br />Leger De 0PU— LOT 330 W & 7C BROADWAY zIP cod° 46625 <br />s.re Price Date or Sere Loen Term <br />Actuer Aeer Eaters 7exee ! yr°• Properly Right. Apprate oil MFoe ❑ Loeaenald E] Db Z. PUG <br />lyrl Loan charges to be pnld by sailer a Other gates Conc°satonb <br />OF Pi7BLIC WDRKS VA <br />oAdSOSOUTH�c0—P.—CA[�7T BEND iN•DIA API <br />APPr°la°r CARPENTER dress <br />msnucuons to Apgrule°r APPRAISE FOR MARKET VALUE <br />Location <br />W Urban <br />Built-up <br />❑ Over 75% <br />suburban <br />X❑ 25% to 76% <br />R ura1 <br />❑ Under 26% <br />Growth Rate ❑ Furly <br />Dev. 1:1Rapid <br />❑ Steady <br />Property Values <br />❑ Increasing <br />❑ Stable <br />Slow <br />M Declining <br />Demand/Supply <br />❑ Shortage <br />❑ In Balance <br />191 Oversupply <br />Marketing Time <br />❑ Under 3 Mos, <br />❑ 4-6 Mos. <br />X❑ Over 6 Mos. <br />Present Land Use 50 <br />%1 Fmly % 2-4 Family <br />5 0 % Apts. <br />% Condo % Commercial <br />% Industrial % Vacant <br />% <br />Change in Present Land Use <br />❑Not Likely <br />Did Likely (•I <br />n Taking Placef') <br />(,)From RESIDENTIAL <br />ToINSTITUTIONAL <br />Predominant Occupancy <br />❑ Owner <br />❑ Tenant <br />% Vacant <br />Single Family Price Range <br />S to S <br />Predominant Value $ <br />Single Family Age <br />yrs. to <br />yrs. Predominant <br />Age yrs <br />Good Avg. <br />Fair <br />Poor <br />Employment Stability <br />El <br />N1 <br />Q <br />El <br />COnvenlGnco to Employment <br />❑ <br />N1 <br />Convenience to Shopping <br />Convenience to Schools <br />M <br />❑ <br />Adequacy of Public Transportation <br />❑ <br />x <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />Recreational Facilities <br />❑ <br />FRI <br />❑ <br />Adequacy of Utilities <br />❑ <br />n <br />❑ <br />Property Compatibility <br />Protection from Detrimental Conditions <br />❑ <br />Police and Fire Protection <br />El <br />1Z <br />11 <br />El <br />General Appearance of Properties <br />y <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />Appeal to Market <br />❑ <br />51 <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />Comments including those factors, favorable or unfavorable, affecting marketebitity (e.g. public parks, schools, view, noise): SUBJECT LOT IS IN A REDEVELOPMENT <br />AREA ^UNDER THESOUTHBEND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION. SUBJECT AREA IS OLD AND SEVERAL OF THE <br />IN AVERAGE, BUT MOST IN FA <br />�1'1,.-en'slicns 39.62 X 153 6058.81 Sq. Ft or a?F os corner Lot <br />assihcaGon$-RESIDENTIAL Presont improvements X❑ do ❑ do not conform to zoning regulations <br />Highest and best use ❑ Present use FXJ Other (specify) DEVELOPED RESIr)F_WTTAT,T,V <br />Public <br />Other {Describe) OFF SITE IMPROVEMENTS Topography FLAT <br />Electricity <br />Street Access X❑ Public ❑ Private Size AVERAGE <br />( <br />Gas X <br />surface PAVEMENT Snaps AVERAGE <br />(q <br />water Fx� <br />Maintenance Public ❑ Private View AVERAGE <br />San Sewer FX1 <br />Q Storm Sower Fx] CurbiGuiter Drainage AVERAGE <br />❑ Underground <br />Elec. & Tel. E S€dewalk FX1 Street Lights Is the Property located In a HUD Identified Special Flood Hazard Area? X No ❑ yes <br />Comments (favorable or <br />unfavorable including any apparent adverse easemems, encroachments or other adverse conditions): THE APPEARS TO BE NO UNFAVORABLE <br />OR ADVERSE EASEMENTS OR ENCROACM4ENTS OTHER THAN THE NORMAL RIGHT OF WAY AND UTILITY. <br />- 7ne undersigned has recited <br />three recent sales of properties most similar and proximate to subject and has cov,derad these it the market analysis. The description includes a dollar adjustment <br />rerlecting market reaction to those items of significant variation between the subject and comparable properties, It a significant item in the comparable property Is superior to or more favorable <br />than the subject property, <br />a minus f-I adjustment Is made thus reducing the indicated value of subject; if a significant item in the comparable is Inferior to or lass favorable than the subject <br />Property. a plus (+) adjustment Is made thus Increasing the indicated value of the subjoct. <br />ITEM <br />SUBJECT PROPERTY <br />COMPARABLE NO, 1 <br />COMPARABLE NO. 2 <br />COMPARABLE NO. 3 <br />Address <br />317 E BROAD— <br />723 SOUTH BEND <br />2224 HILLSIDE <br />1600 WARREN <br />WAY SOUTH BEND <br />AVENUE SO. BEND <br />SO. BEND <br />SO. BEND <br />Proximity to subject <br />2 MILES NORTH <br />2 MILES SW <br />2 MILES SW <br />Sales Price <br />5 <br />s 1850.00 <br />1500 <br />s 2000 <br />}, <br />Price <br />if <br />�. <br />Data Source <br />ASSESSMENT <br />MLCS' # 127716 <br />MLS# 126070 <br />MLS# 122178 <br />Z' <br />Dare of Sale and <br />DESCRIPTION <br />DESCRIPTION <br />Ad stment <br />DESCRIPTION + <br />Ad'ustment <br />DESCRIPTION Adjustment <br />Q, <br />Time Adjustment <br />08 28 96 <br />05 22 96 <br />12 20 95 <br />LU <br />Location <br />SINGLE FAMILY <br />MULTI —FM <br />SINGLE FM <br />I SINGLE FM <br />Id <br />LC <br />SuerView <br />FAIR <br />FAIR <br />AVERAGE —750 <br />1AVERAGE —750 <br />a' <br />SIZE <br />6058.81 SF <br />10873 <br />—750 <br />3990 +200 1 <br />4800 +100 <br />Sates or Financing <br />Concessions <br />Net Ad. ('total) <br />Plus X Minus 8 <br />—75D <br />D Plus X Minus s <br />—550 <br />Plus %Minus a —650 <br />Indicated value <br />I7Bx& 3t} 3a ', <br />?da[t 3o i <br />33? 32 5 <br />of subjoct` <br />-' <br />100 <br />- <br />c3rs4 6:3.3''r S <br />950 <br />o a -;.g ,5 I':> s 1,350 <br />Comments on Markel Data: <br />THE MARKET SALE <br />COMPARABLES NO. S 2 AND 3 ARE LOCATED IN THE RUM VILLAGE AREA <br />OF SOUTH BEND. THESE PROPERTIES WERE PURCHASED BY A DEVELOPER TO CONSTRUCT SMALL HOUSES IN <br />THIS AREA. NO 1 WAS LOCATED ON SR 23 WHICH MAY CAUSE A NEGATIVE IMPACT ON THE LOCATION. <br />I. Comments and Conditions of Appraisal: SUBJECT IS LOCATED NEAR THE: SAMPLE-EWING REDEVELOPMENT AREA WHICH IS TO <br />ZIBECOME DEVELOPED AS A JUVENILE DETENTION CENTER AND POTENTIALLY AN INSTITUTION OF HIGHER <br />0 LEARNING. THE LOT WILL BECOME INFLUENCED BY THIS DEVELOPMENT. <br />H <br />_d <br />Final Reconciliation: THE SUBJECT IS ON A CORNER WITH AN ALLEY WHICH IS SUPERIOR PARCELS IN THE SUBJECT <br />L, AREA. ZT WOULD APPEAR THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY RELATES TO NO. 2 AND THE PURCHASER OF NO.3 GAVE <br />HIGHER VALUE FOR A DEEPER LOT THAN NO. 2 COMPARABLE <br />J I ESTIMATE THE MA VALUE, AS DEFINED, (3GSUBJECT PROPERTY AS OF DECEMBER 30 1996 to be b 950.00 <br />ii Appraiser(s) <br />,{ •t Review Appraiser (if applicable) <br />DOUGLAS L . / PENTER ff XD Did ❑ Did Not Physically Inspect Properly <br />5167.7 MCS, Richardson, TX 75081 1214) 699.7783 li Form LA2 <br />