My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CED Annexation Policy Plan 1992
sbend
>
Public
>
Archived Plan Documents
>
CED Annexation Policy Plan 1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2025 10:03:16 AM
Creation date
4/22/2025 10:02:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Dept of Community Investment
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
111 URBAN GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT <br />A. EXISTING LAND USE <br />Existing land uses were identified by four (4) classifications. These are residential, <br />commercial/industrial, recreational/institutional and agriculture/undeveloped. <br />Existing land uses were collected and mapped as precisely as possible, however, <br />the land use mapping must be recognized as still being fairly general and <br />intended for planning use only. Exact parcel -by -parcel land use identification <br />will be required when a specific annexation is proposed. Existing land uses are <br />shown on Map 2. <br />As previously noted, a remonstrance can be filed by property owners against an <br />annexation initiated by the City Council. If the proposed annexation is desired by <br />the City under the Option 1 type of annexation, one of the possible criteria that <br />must be established is that the area have a resident population of at least three <br />(3) persons per acre. Another possible criteria is that the area be at least sixty <br />percent (60%) subdivided. The mapping of existing residential lands was <br />performed in such a manner that the area classified as residential should meet <br />either of these criteria. Small isolated clusters of residences or individual <br />residential properties thus are not shown on Map 2. Conversely, new <br />subdivisions that are not fully developed were mapped as residential land. At <br />the time of a proposed annexation, the resident population and subdivided <br />status will need to be checked for the 'specific territory being considered for <br />annexation. <br />The greatest concentration of residential land is located to the northeast of the <br />City, generally east of the St. Joseph River. This overall area should easily meet <br />the population density or 60°lo subdivided requirements, although there are <br />some large undeveloped parcels of land that, if included in an annexation, could <br />reduce the overall population density or subdivided requirements. The older <br />residential areas between the St. Joseph River and Juniper Road should easily <br />satisfy the population density criteria. <br />The two general areas that have the next highest concentrations of residential <br />land use are south of the City, between Locust Road and Miami Highway, and <br />west of the City, between U.S. 20 and Grant Road/Crumstown Highway. These <br />two areas, overall, will be very close to meeting either the density or the <br />subdivided criteria and will need to be reviewed with respect to the actual <br />boundary for any annexations proposed in the area. <br />19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.