Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 26. 2002 <br />These older, decent, working class women who worked their whole lives just wanted to have some <br />peace and quiet and they asked her what she was going to do about it. <br />Councilmember Pfeifer advised that the first thing she did about it was talk to neighborhood groups <br />and the South Bend Police Department and ask what could be done. She was informed that there <br />was not anything that could be done because this behavior was taking place on the public sidewalk <br />and without probable cause a police officer was unable to go up to these people who were standing <br />there even if they were engaged in this kind of behavior. She contacted Council Attorney Kathleen <br />Cekanski - Farrand, Councilmembers and Police Departments in the area and they decided to have <br />a series of workshops. Two (2) workshops were held at IUSB and were cosponsored by the Criminal <br />Justice Department. Speakers were brought in from Seattle, Washington as well as various Police <br />Departments. A year later another workshop was held and this time it was based on a gang <br />ordinance that had been prepared by the Chicago Police Department. At that time, there were a <br />couple of different municipalities dealing with this kind of behavior. The City of Philadelphia had <br />this type of problem but it was mostly with their homeless. However, Chicago was dealing with <br />issues of gang and criminal behavior which is the kind of behavior that was going on in South Bend. <br />The City of Chicago passed an ordinance which was challenged and taken to the Supreme Court. <br />The Supreme Court found it unconstitutional and sent it back to be refined and to be made more <br />behavior specific. There were definite concerns about racial profiling and making sure that people <br />were not stopped and harassed unnecessarily because of their race, sex or ethnic orientation. The <br />Chicago Police Department refined their ordinance with the blueprint that the Supreme Court <br />Justices gave them. South Bend was very interested in the Chicago ordinance and a third loitering <br />conference was held in the evening at the downtown public library. <br />Under the leadership of the Council Attorney an ordinance was put together which was taken to the <br />public for input through nine (9) small group neighborhood workshops. The workshops were held <br />in River Park, Rum Village, the west side, the near west side, at LANA, two (2) at the NNN, at the <br />Boys and Girls Club and at the Charles Black Recreation Center. Councilmember Pfeifer noted that <br />she and Council Attorney Kathleen Cekanski Farrand were present at those meetings to address any <br />kinds of issues that anyone might have and they learned some very good things and heard concerns <br />by neighbors. They made the ordinance better. <br />Councilmember Pfeifer reminded members of the Council that she has been before them a couple <br />of times on this issue. The last time a couple of neighbors came forward with additional concerns <br />and at that time she recommended that the vote on this ordinance be tabled in order for continued <br />revisions. Councilmember Pfeifer advised that a delegation from South Bend visited Chicago and <br />met with the individuals there who have been working with this type of ordinance for years and <br />again revisions were made. Some of the public concerns raised earlier were that the ordinance <br />should be City wide and it is City wide. Questions were raised about how hot spots would be <br />designated. She noted that hot spots will be designated through input from neighbors and <br />Councilmembers. The Chief of Police would then simply accept all of the evidence and would <br />accept the area as a hot spot. Councilmember Pfeifer noted that the Chief of Police does not <br />designate hot spots but will receive input from the neighbors, Councilmembers and through calls <br />to service which come from the neighbors. She noted that occasionally, due to increased behavior, <br />there could be some emergency hot spots designated. Councilmember Pfeifer emphasized that the <br />police officers being able to stop and approach a citizen is going to be behavior driven and behavior <br />specific and is behavior that is gang or criminal behavior which is defined by the Indiana state law. <br />A couple young people standing on the corner is not gang behavior and it is not criminal behavior <br />and no officer has any right to approach any person who is engaged in that kind of nonviolent non- <br />criminal, non -gang behavior. If this ordinance is passed tonight, it will not be effective until January <br />of 2003. <br />Councilmember Pfeifer indicated that there will be additional extensive training involving <br />Councilmembers, the Chief of Police, the Mayor and administration. When the Council feels good <br />about it, it will then go to the next level with the Police Department and all the way down to make <br />sure that everyone is clear and on board. Councilmember Pfeifer noted that she has a letter from <br />Police Chief Larry Bennett supporting this ordinance and pointed out that there are a lot of <br />misconceptions about this ordinance and they want to make sure that everyone is clear. She noted <br />