Laserfiche WebLink
Public Works and Property Vacation Committee <br /> Committee Report <br /> September 26, 1994 <br /> Page 2 <br /> Council Member Ladewski questioned how long this had been a problem. Mr. <br /> Hennessey noted that it is been there for at least the past ten tears but has been heightened <br /> in light of the renovation of the Parking Garage beginning last year. <br /> Ann Kolota as a Member of the Redevelopment Department noted that she is against <br /> the proposed vacation in light of the potential development of the Robertson's building. <br /> She then reviewed a handout(copy attached). She further noted that she believes that there <br /> is a congestion problem. <br /> Mr. Carter Wolfe showed pictures to the Committee and also voiced opposition to <br /> the proposed vacation.He stated that historical buildings d o <br /> have a hardship <br /> clause and that <br /> a <br /> perhaps that the GSA could pursue that to minimize the cost tothe tax payers. <br /> Mr. Hennessey noted that he does not believe that there are docking problems with <br /> regard to the Robertson's building. <br /> Council Member Washington noted that the proposed vacation may make travel <br /> difficult or inconvenient and Council Member Ladewski noted that he believes that the <br /> vacation may impede the overall growth in the area. Council Member Washington voiced <br /> concern with regard to the Redevelopment Commission not receiving notice of the action <br /> taken by the Board of Public Works. <br /> Council Member Slavinskas questioned whether the owners of the Robertson's <br /> building really needed access from both directions. Council Member Puzzello and Council <br /> Member Slavinskas questioned whether such buildings needed service access from two <br /> separate alleys. <br /> Council Member Luecke stated that he believes that the vacation would not solve the <br /> GSA problems. Council Member Luecke stated that the temporary blockage of the alleys <br /> should be looked at by the Board of Public Works and that the Department of the Interior <br /> should be contacted with regard to the hardship consideration in light of the historic status <br /> of the building in question. <br /> Council Member Duda noted that she also believes that the closing of the alley <br /> would not solve the overall problem however she is concerned of the environmental <br /> problems which appear to be ongoing. <br /> Council Member Duda, made a motion, seconded by Council Member Ladewski, <br /> that Bill No. 69-94 be set to the full Council unfavorably. The motion passed 3 to 0 to 1 <br /> with Council Member Washington abstaining. <br /> There being no further business to come before the Committee the meeting was <br /> adjourned at 4:55 P.M. <br /> Respectfully Submitted, <br /> Council Member, Steve Luecke,Chairperson <br /> Public Works and Property Vacation Committee • <br /> Attachments <br /> 1.711:ILLLiLVV L'1'lr LV lt'71:+J . <br />