Laserfiche WebLink
Public Works and Property Vacation <br /> Committee Report <br /> June 13, 1994 <br /> Page 2 <br /> Mr. Roger Bailey,of the Rum Village Association, stated that the Common Council <br /> should have received a letter from Don Newicky of the Association against the proposed <br /> scrap yard. He stated that he believes it has not been a functioning scrap yard that has been <br /> licensed for the past three to four years.He questioned parking,noise, bathroom facilities, <br /> and high traffic counts in the area. <br /> Mr. Patrick Nowack, a board member of the Rum Village Association, also spoke <br /> against the proposed scrap yard. <br /> Mr. Roger Benko asked whether EPA had tested the land in question. He stated that <br /> in the 1920s and 1930s there was a roofing company located there. He also believed that <br /> the real property owner was Schaeffer Gear. He questioned the sewage facility and the <br /> amount of property in question. <br /> Kathy Dempsey stated that the area is 1.347 acres and showed a printout to the <br /> Council. <br /> Mr. Tom Brockton, the owner of A-1 Auto Parts one half block away from the <br /> proposed junk yard facility, stated that the proposed junk yard would not have an office, <br /> restroom facilities, or building while all other operations of this type are required to have <br /> them. He stated that there is no off street parking provided by the proposed junk yard <br /> operation. <br /> Council Member Gene Ladewski stated that the key number for the property in <br /> question 37801 and does have 1.347 acres. <br /> Council Member Duda questioned the bathroom facilities.It was noted that they are <br /> not required by local ordinance. She was informed that a license was taken away through a <br /> preliminary injunction procedure through the court system in September, 1987 and that <br /> they were enjoined from doing business from that date forward. There had been <br /> subsequent applications for license, but none had been issued. She was also advised that <br /> any use within the "E"Zoning would be appropriate for the area in question. It was also <br /> noted that EPA testing for soil is not required by local ordinances. She stated that she has a <br /> growing concern over water and soil contamination and that,perhaps, future legislation is <br /> necessary in this area. <br /> The Council Attorney noted that the ordinance in question was passed by the <br /> Common Council in 1979, and had copies of the Council meeting minutes from the <br /> meeting. <br /> Council Member Ladewski questioned whether the one thousand foot restriction of <br /> the 1979 ordinances applies, and Council Member Zakrzewski stated that it does. There <br /> were also remarks made by Council Member Zackrzewsld with regard to railroad ties on <br /> the property, slag for the off street parking,rim tires, scrap metal,fencing.He stated that at <br /> a meeting held in 1983 with city officials, Mr. Rhodes, and Mr. Cupery, that they were <br /> advised that anything that they would do was"at their own risk". <br /> It was noted that Mr. Cuprey applied for a 1993 license to do business, but did not <br /> comply. <br />