11-14-94 Zoning & Annexation - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r Committee Report Zoning and Annexation November 14, 1994 Page 3 Ann Kolata voiced concern of such an inclusion and questioned whether the Center City Associates or the Downtown Business Association were contacted. It was noted that they were not directly contacted and that state law currently regulates where establishments which serve liquor can be located with regard to churches and schools and the proximity to each of them. Ann Kolata also noted that A-3 is currently getting more residential in nature and that the protection aspect is very important. Council Member Luecke stated that the essential question is whether they can be located within 500 feet of an A-3 mixed use. Following further discussion , Council Member Duda made a motion, seconded by Council Member Slavinskas that in section 21- 117.06 e that the Multi- Family at t e words "except the A-3 mixed use Multi Famil Residential and Y Commercial District"be deleted.The motion passed. Council Member Slavinskas stated that the overall Bill is well thought out and that he would support it. He stressed however that his support of the Bill should not be construed as supporting off-track betting. Following further discussion, Council Member Slavinskas made a motion, seconded by Council Member Duda that substitute Bill No. 89-94 as amended be recommended favorably to Council. The motion passed. The Committee then reviewed Bill No. 87-94 which is a zoning request for the property located at 2610 Prairie Ave. Mr. Borni noted that it received a favorable recommendation from the Area Plan Commission. Mr. Ken Fedder the Attorney for the Petitioner made the presentation. He noted that Bruno's the petitioner is required to provide 179 spaces and that 183 spaces have been provided per the site plan.Fencing would be consistent with local requirements. Mr. Gary Libbey then read a letter written by Kathy Dempsey stating that maintenance of the property was acceptable at this time. In response to a question raised by Council Member Zakrzewski Mr. Fedder stated that if the need arises that parallel parking along the driveway would be utilized. Mr Borni noted that this could be addressed by the final site plan however based on the review of the site plan parking was not provided in the driveway and therefore would be a violation. Mr. Fedder stated that he would contact the Land Surveyor and report back to the Council this evening. Council Member Slavinskas stated that without using the driveway parallel parking the Petitioner shows 183 parking spaces. Mr. Fedder again stated that he would contact Mr.Dansch on this issue. Council Member Zakrzewski asked questions with regard to required screening and voiced safety considerations,traffic and noise considerations. •