Laserfiche WebLink
Human Resources and Economic Development Committee <br /> October 23 , 1989 <br /> Page 2 <br /> Following further discussion Council Member Zakrzewski made <br /> a motion seconded by Council Member Puzzello that Resolution <br /> No. 89-76 be recommended favorably to Council. The motion <br /> passed. <br /> Council Member Zakrzewski then made a motion seconded by <br /> Council Member Puzzello that Resolution No. 89-77 be <br /> recommended favorably to Council. The motion passed. <br /> Citizen member Margot Doyle then questioned Council Member <br /> Luecke with regard to the impact of the tax abatement <br /> lawsuit. He noted that the review process of possible <br /> amendments of the current procedures would be ongoing. He <br /> also noted that in light of the lawsuit, that various other <br /> amendments would be discussed with the committee. The <br /> Council Attorney noted that there would probably be a need <br /> for an expanded role of the Department of Economic <br /> Development both at the committee stage as well as at the <br /> regular Common Council meetings. She suggested that at a <br /> future meeting of the Human Resources and Economic <br /> Development that the Committee should consider whether <br /> petitioners should be present at the committee meeting at <br /> both the declaratory and confirmatory stage; and whether a <br /> member from the Department of Economic Development should <br /> review their report into the record at the regular Common <br /> Council meetings similar to the procedure used for rezonings <br /> in the role of the Area Plan Commission staff. <br /> There being no further business to come before the <br /> committee, the meeting was adjourned at 5: 15 p.m. <br /> Respectfully submitted, <br /> Council Member Steve Luecke, Chair Person <br /> Human Resources and Economic Development Committee <br /> (a copy of the October 11, 1989 committee report is attached <br /> to the original of the committee minutes) <br /> SL:srk <br /> - - <br /> The project cost, including the purchase of the new equipment, is <br /> estimated at $935, 000. <br /> 1)M (`nnnt<,_ritar 1:211a.1;nr. • Cnnt), RonA T..ri:o..o Alf.(11 • ')10/')QA_02'71 T7.... 1111 MQA ACM') <br />