Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING MAY 27, 2008 <br /> <br /> <br />Councilmember Dieter stated that a brochure may be found on the railing in the Council <br />Chambers explaining those procedures. <br /> <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARINGS <br /> <br /> <br />BILL NO. 20-08 PUBLIC HEARING ON A BILL TO VACATE <br /> THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: <br /> THE FIRST ALLEY TO BE VACATED IS THE <br /> FIRST EAST/WEST ALLEY SOUTH OF <br /> GOLDEN AVENUE FROM WOODWARD <br /> AVENUE TO THE FIRST NORTH/SOUTH <br /> ALLEY FOR A DISTANCE OF 120 FEET AND A <br /> WIDTH OF 14 FEET. THE SECOND ALLEY TO <br /> BE VACATED IS THE FIRST EAST/WEST <br /> ALLEY SOUTH OF GOLDEN AVENUE FROM <br /> RIVERSIDE DRIVE TO THE FIRST <br /> NORTH/SOUTH ALLEY FOR A DISTANCE OF <br /> 120 FEET AND A WIDTH OF 14 FEET <br /> <br />Councilmember Varner made a motion to hear the substitute version of this bill. <br />Councilmember White seconded the motion which carried by a voice vote of eight (8) <br />ayes. <br /> <br />Councilmember LaFountain, Vice-Chairperson, Public Works and Property Vacation <br />Committee, reported that this committee met this afternoon on this bill and sends it to the <br />full Council with no recommendation due to the lack of a quorum. <br /> <br />Mr. Michael Neises, 1043 Riverside Drive, South Bend, Indiana, made the presentation <br />for this bill. <br /> <br />Mr. Neises advised that he and his wife desired an older home and they got the <br />impression that South Bend was making a renewed commitment to its neighborhoods <br />that’s what led them to leave the Granger, Indiana area and move in August of 2006 and <br />purchase a previous rented property at 1043 Riverside Drive. Mr. Neises stated that the <br />one undesirable feature of the property is a cross-alley on the north side of the property, <br />particularly because his home sits right on the alley without any buffer. He stated that his <br />side door literally opens on the alley, with the risk of being hit by a vehicle when opening <br />the door or stepping out of the entryway. Traffic moves too fast, and is of a “cut <br />through” nature is generally unsafe. He and his wife are concerned as they get older and <br />when they have their grandchildren over. Mr. Neises stated that privacy and safety are of <br />great concern. The alley gives access to individuals to their side and back yards, making <br />them feel very vulnerable at times. There have been times when teenage boys just hang <br />out in the alley, literally right under their windows. He urged the Council to vote <br />favorably on this bill. <br /> <br />th <br />Mr. Gary Gilot, Director, Board of Public Works, 13 Floor County-City Building, South <br />Bend, Indiana, stated that the Board of Public Works is in favor of this bill, subject to a <br />cross-access easement agreement. Mr. Gilot stated that they received a copy of that this <br />afternoon and suggest to the Council that if they choose to recommend favorably to make <br />their motion to approve subject to recording the cross access easement agreement. <br /> <br />Council President Rouse asked if there was a record of how many calls for service were <br />logged at this location. <br /> <br />Mr. Gilot stated that he did not have that information and that he cannot quantify that <br />data and stated that he had qualitative antidotal reports. <br /> <br />Kathleen Cekanski Farrand pointed out that on Section V. on page 2 of the proposed <br />ordinance makes it contingent upon the recording of the cross access easement and also <br /> 2 <br /> <br />