Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING APRIL 28, 2008 <br /> <br />Mr. Toby Todd, 52776 Shellbark, South Bend, Indiana, advised that he just moved into <br />the neighborhood a couple of years ago. He spent years obtaining good credit so that he <br />could purchase his first home. Mr. Todd stated that he has spent countless hours and <br />money improving his property. He noted that the increase in traffic will forever alter the <br />footprint of the neighborhood. Mr. Todd urged the Council to vote against the proposed <br />development. <br /> <br />In rebuttal, Mr. Danch stated that in regard to light pollution, there are restrictions that <br />apply to development in the City of South Bend. All the lighting that would be done on <br />this particular site has to be shielded and has to be down lighted, so that in essence there <br />is no light spillage over onto any adjacent property. Mr. Danch stated that they will take <br />care of any light issues that might arise. He noted that there was concern about <br />pedestrian safety on Lynnewood Avenue by the additional traffic from the proposed <br />development. Mr. Danch noted that the proposed development is south of the library, so <br />the only traffic that would be of concern is that of the library itself. So residents and <br />children walking down Lynnewood would only be faced by the traffic heading north onto <br />Lynnewood, and would not be affected by traffic from the proposed development going <br />south onto Lynnewood down to Cleveland. Mr. Danch reiterated that there are the ten <br />(10) written commitments that he read into the record. The commitments are there for <br />the protection of the residents of the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Mr. Cooreman advised that it is not good business to sign leases before the development <br />has been approved by the local governing body. Mr. Cooreman stated that change is a <br />hard thing to accept. The Cleveland Road area is changing and this development will <br />have minimal impact on the surrounding properties. He noted that there are <br />developments that back up to residential property all over the county. He stated that he is <br />investing 4 million dollars in this project. He stated that the reason that St. Joseph <br />County had to be exempted out of the 1% cap on property tax is because there is not <br />enough businesses investing in the City of South Bend and that is the reason that our <br />taxes are higher. Eight of the top ten employers in the City of South Bend are not-for- <br />profit. Mr. Cooreman reiterated that with this development the proposed taxes will be <br />approximately $80,000 to $100,000 of new tax base added to the City of South Bend. He <br />again stated that he would absolutely not lease or rent to cigarette shops, tattoo parlors, <br />bars, or other non family friendly users. He asked the Council for their favorable <br />approval. <br /> <br />Councilmember Varner made a motion for favorable recommendation to full Council <br />concerning this bill, subject to the written commitments. Councilmember Rouse <br />seconded the motion which carried by a voice vote of seven (7) ayes and two (2) nays <br />(Councilmember’s Henry Davis, Kirsits.) <br /> <br />Councilmember Puzzello made a motion to set this bill for third reading on May 12, <br />2008. Councilmember Varner seconded the motion which carried by a voice vote of nine <br />(9) ayes. <br /> <br /> <br />BILL NO. 20-08 PUBLIC HEARING ON A BILL TO VACATE <br /> THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: <br /> THE FIRST ALLEY TO BE VACATED IS THE <br /> FIRST EAST/WEST ALLEY SOUTH OF <br /> GOLDEN AVENUE FROM WOODWARD <br /> AVENUE TO THE FIRST NORTH/SOUTH <br /> ALLEY FOR A DISTANCE OF 120 FEET AND A <br /> WIDTH OF 14 FEET. THE SECOND ALLEY TO <br /> BE VACATED IS THE FIRST EAST/WEST <br /> ALLEY SOUTH OF GOLDEN AVENUE FROM <br /> RIVERSIDE DRIVE TO THE FIRST <br /> NORTH/SOUTH ALLEY FOR A DISTANCE OF <br /> 120 FEET AND A WIDTH OF 14 FEET <br /> <br /> 14 <br /> <br />