STEVEN M. STANFORD, LPG
<br />Senior Project Manager
<br />Fields of Expertise
<br />Hydrogeology, Groundwater Modeling, Dewatering
<br />System Design, Environmental Geology, Risk
<br />Assessment, Risk Based Corrective Action, Organic
<br />and Inorganic Environmental Chemistry, Site
<br />Characterization, Remedial Action Design and
<br />lmplementation, and RCRA Permitting.
<br />Certification
<br />Licensed Professlonal Geologist: Indiana & Illinois
<br />OSHA Hazwoper Health & Safety Training
<br />OSHA Supervisor's Health & Safety Training
<br />UST Decommissioning: IPCI
<br />UST Professional: Michigan
<br />UST Decommissioning: Indiana
<br />Education
<br />B.S. Geology, Indiana University, 1985.
<br />M.S. Hydrogeology & Environmental Chemistry,
<br />Purdue University, 1998.
<br />Modeling Pollutant Movement In Groundwater, 40 hr
<br />Continuing Education, U. of Wisconsin, 1986.
<br />Risk -Based Corrective Action Applied at Petroleum
<br />Release Sites, 16 hr Continuing Education, American
<br />Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM), 2001.
<br />Professional Summary
<br />W. Stanford is a Senior Project Manager with
<br />Weaver Boos Consultants. Working as a consultant
<br />to industry for 22 years, Mr. Stanford has completed
<br />all phases of facility and hydrogeologic site
<br />characterization, water well design, the pumping and
<br />treatment of groundwater, risk assessment, and
<br />renediation, successfully closing and/or permitting
<br />numerous TSD, UST, LUST, M, and SRP
<br />facilities.
<br />Prior to joining Weaver Boos Consultants, Mr.
<br />Stanford worked for two nationally recognized
<br />environmental firms and co -owned a successful
<br />environmental consulting firm for five years, He has
<br />enjoyed success in dewatering system design,
<br />remedial design, implementation, and the subsequent
<br />closure of many significantly impacted facilities
<br />using state -of -the art remediation technology.
<br />Select Project Experience
<br />Mr. Stanford designed a groundwater interceptor
<br />system at a closed Illinois solid waste disposal
<br />facility that that performed in accordance with its
<br />design parametem. The system included a barrier
<br />wall and interceptor french system arranged to utilize
<br />a naturally occurring sand layer as a landfill under -
<br />drain. The subsurface hydraulics of the system were
<br />designed using the USGS MODFLOW groundwater
<br />flow model.
<br />Numerous groundwater dewatering and drainage
<br />systems have been evaluated, designed, and
<br />consfneted by kvir. Stanford based on fundamental
<br />hydrogeologic principles such as Daroy's law, the
<br />Theint equation, and the Theis equation. He has
<br />conducted numerous aquifer pumping tests to predict
<br />groundwater drawdown, groundwater yield, and to
<br />measure hydraulic conductivity, transmissivity, and
<br />groundwater flow velocity.
<br />Mr. Stanford served as technical coordinator for a
<br />sudden release of 130,000 gallons of chromate -
<br />containing emergency cooling water at an integrated
<br />steel mill, He designed and supervised the
<br />installation of a well point dewatering system to
<br />recover and treat chromated cooling water within 48
<br />hours of the release. Renegotiated termination of the
<br />work and closure of the incident with IDEM Office
<br />of Environmental Response only 10 days after the
<br />work began.
<br />. Stanford was principally responsible for the
<br />imgcological assessment and Groundwater Impact
<br />sessment (GIA) relative to the proposed expansion
<br />three Illinois solid waste disposal facilities. His
<br />rk, including expert testimony, contributed to the
<br />cessfid siting of a proposed 200 -acre landfill
<br />expansion,
<br />The GIAs prepared by Mr. Stanford utilize
<br />groundwater flow models incorporating statistical
<br />evaluation of environmental data and other modeling
<br />input parameters, literature reviews identifying
<br />phystoo- chemical characteristics for chemically
<br />similar groupings of leactiate constituents, multi-
<br />group surrogate modeling with separate sensitivity
<br />analyses, and in select instances, multiple conceptual
<br />models utilized to separately assess migration from
<br />the bottom and side slopes of die landfill liner
<br />
|